Utilizing generalized optimality criteria method for optimal structural design under design-dependent pressure loads

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Abstract
This paper presents a topology optimization framework for continuum structures subjected to design-dependent pressure loads (DDPLs). Unlike fixed external loads, DDPLs change in location, magnitude, and direction as the structural layout evolves, introducing significant challenges in load modeling and numerical stability. To address this issue, the Boundary Identification–Load Evolution (BILE) model is employed to accurately impose evolving surface pressure loads throughout the optimization process. The proposed framework integrates the BILE model with a Generalized Optimality Criteria Method (GOCM), offering a robust alternative to the classical Optimality Criteria Method (OCM). GOCM provides greater flexibility in handling constraints and enhances convergence properties. The SIMP-based material interpolation is used, and structural compliance is minimized under a volume constraint using adjoint sensitivity analysis and density filtering. Two benchmark examples are presented to compare the performance of GOCM and OCM under identical DDPL conditions. Quantitative results show that GOCM achieves up to 21.35\% lower compliance, reduces computational time by 45.68\%, and requires significantly fewer iterations compared to OCM, while maintaining solution quality. These results confirm that GOCM not only improves numerical efficiency but also enhances the stability and effectiveness of topology optimization under complex, evolving load boundaries. The proposed approach offers a reliable and computationally efficient method for advanced structural design problems involving design-dependent loading, with promising applicability in high-performance engineering systems.
Keywords

[1] E. Andreassen, A. Clausen, M. Schevenels, B.S. Lazarov, and O. Sigmund, Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 43 (2011), no. 1, 1-16.
[2] M.P. Bendsoe and N. Kikuchi, Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engin. 71 (1988), no. 2, 197-224.
[3] M.P. Bendsoe and O. Sigmund, Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, and Material, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, March 2004.
[4] B. Bourdin and A. Chambolle, Design‑dependent loads in topology optimization, ESAIM: Control Optim. Cal. Var. 9 (2003), 19-48.
[5] B.C. Chen and N. Kikuchi, Topology optimization with design‑dependent loads, Finite Elements Anal. Design 37 (2001), no. 1, 57-70.
[6] J. Du and N. Olhoff, Topological optimization of continuum structures with design‑dependent surface loading‑Part II: Algorithm and examples for 3D problems, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 27 (2004), no. 3, 166-177.
[7] W. Fan, Z. Xu, and Z. Zhang, A PID‑optimality criteria method for structural topology optimization, Optim. Engin. 25 (2024), 439-458.
[8] J. Guan and W. Zhang, Improved topological optimization method based on particle swarm optimization algorithm, IEEE Access 10 (2022), 52067-52074.
[9] V.B. Hammer and N. Olhoff, Topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to pressure loading, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 19 (2000), no. 2, 85-92.
[10] B. Hassani and E. Hinton, Homogenization and Structural Topology Optimization, 1st ed., Engineering Sciences Library, vol. 1, Springer, Berlin, January 1999.
[11] O. Ibbadode, Z. Zhang, P. Rahnama, A. Bonakdar, and E. Toyserkani, Topology optimization of structures under design‑dependent pressure loads by a boundary identification‑load evolution (BILE) model, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 62 (2020), no. 6, 1865-1883.
[12] N.H. Kim, T. Dong, D. Weinberg, and J. Dalidd, Generalized Optimality Criteria Method for Topology Optimization, Appl. Sci. 11 (2021), no. 7, 3175.
[13] P. Kumar, TOPress: A MATLAB implementation for topology optimization of structures subjected to design‑dependent pressure loads, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 66 (2023), no. 4, Article 97.
[14] P. Kumar, TOPress3D: 3D topology optimization with design‑dependent pressure loads in MATLAB, Optim. Engin. 26 (2025), 1113-1141.
[15] P. Kumar, J.S. Frouws, and M. Langelaar, Topology optimization of fluidic pressure‑loaded structures and compliant mechanisms using the Darcy method, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 61 (2020), no. 4, 1637-1655.
[16] S. Li, J. Yin, X. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and H. Wang, A novel reduced basis method for adjoint sensitivity analysis of dynamic topology optimization, Engin. Anal. Boundary Elements 162 (2024), 403-419.
[17] H. Lin, H. Liu, and P. Wei, A parallel parameterized level set topology optimization framework for large‑scale structures with unstructured meshes, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engin. 397 (2022), 115112.
[18] Y. Lu, Q. Luo, and L. Tong, Topology optimization for pressurized nonlinear structures using substructure and experimental studies, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 68 (2025), no. 1, Article 31.
[19] H.R. Najafabadi, T.C. Martins, M.S.G. Tsuzuki, and A. Barari, Structural design with self‑weight and inertial loading using simulated annealing for non‑gradient topology optimization, Machines 12 (2024), no. 1, Article 25.
[20] I.P.A. Papadopoulos, Numerical analysis of the SIMP model for the topology optimization problem of minimizing compliance in linear elasticity, Numer. Math. 157 (2025), 213-248.
[21] T. Rochefort‑Beaudoin, A. Vadean, J. Gamache, and S. Achiche, Comparative study of first‑order moving asymptotes optimizers for the moving morphable components topology optimization framework, Proc. ASME 2022 Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Vol. 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., 2022.

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 03 August 2026

  • Receive Date 22 July 2025
  • Revise Date 12 September 2025
  • Accept Date 12 November 2025