Visualizing the scientific collaboration of nonlinear analysis in co-authorship: a scientometrics study

Document Type : Research Paper


Knowledge and Information Science Department, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran


Visualizing the scientific outputs in the field of nonlinear analysis (NA) and Mapping the co-author network of researchers in the Web of Science database (WOS) were the main purpose of this research based on scientometric methods. The rate of authors, source titles, Countries/Regions, research area and organizations in NA filed at WOS during 1985-2019 was determined. Co-author network, university co-authorship network and Country co-authorship network in NA filed at WOS during the time span investigated, also were identified by researchers. Totally, 12188 documents on NA subject were indexed on the web of science core collection from 1985 to 2019. The co-author network was mapped and analyzed. The results showed that there is an increasing rate of publishing documents in NA during the time of research.


[1] H. Behrens and P. Luksch, Mathematics 1868–2008: a bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics 86 (2011), no. 1,
[2] S.P. Borgatti, NetDraw: Graph visualization software, Harvard, MA: Anal. Technol., 2002.
[3] S.P. Borgatti, M.G. Everett and L.C. Freeman, Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis, Harvard,
MA: Anal. Technol. 6 (2002), 12–15.
[4] H. Bozdogan and O. Akbilgic, Social network analysis of scientific collaborations across different subject fields,
Inf. Serv. Use 33 (2013), no. 3-4, 219-233.
[5] S. Ebrahimy and F. Osareh, What are the scientific notions formed in mathematics discipline in SCI and SSCI
databases?, Int. J. Inf. Sci. Manag. 10 (2012), no. 2, 1–13.
[6] Z. Ersozlu and M. Karakus, Mathematics anxiety: mapping the literature by bibliometric analysis, Eurasia J.
Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 15 (2019), no. 2, em1673.
[7] B.A. Herbel-Eisenmann and S. Otten, Mapping mathematics in classroom discourse, J. Res. Math. Educ. 42
(2011), no. 5, 451–485.
[8] J. Kim and C. Perez, Co-authorship network analysis in industrial ecology research community, J. Ind. Ecol. 19
(2015), no. 2, 222–235.
[9] I.M. Nadhiroh, R. Hardiyati, M. Amelia and T. Handayani, Mathematics and statistics related studies in Indonesia using co-authorship network analysis, Int. J. Adv. Intell. Inf. 4 (2018), no. 2, 142–153.[10] M.E.J. Newman, Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101 (2004),
[11] E. Otte and R. Rousseau, Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences, J. Inf.
Sci. 28 (2002), no. 6, 441–453.
[12] P. Racherla and C. Hu, A social network perspective of tourism research collaborations, Ann. Tourism Res. 37
(2010), no. 4, 1012–1034.
[13] N.J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, VOSviewer manual, Leiden, Univeristeit Leiden, 1 (2013) no. 1, 1–53. .
[14] P. Wang, F. Zhu, H. Song, and J. Hou, A bibliometric retrospective of the journal Eurasia journal of mathematics,
science and technology education between 2012 and 2017, Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 14 (2017), no. 3,
[15] Q. Ye, H. Song and T. Li, Cross-institutional collaboration networks in tourism and hospitality research, Tourism
Manag. Perspect. 2 (2012), 55–64.
[16] P. Zhou and L. Leydesdorff. The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics,
Scientometrics 72 (2007), no. 2, 185–200.
Volume 13, Issue 2
July 2022
Pages 1663-1671
  • Receive Date: 09 August 2020
  • Accept Date: 20 January 2022