International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications

Fuglede-Putnam type theorems for extension of $\ast$-class $A$ operators

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Faculty of Science, P.O.Box 7, Mu'tah University, Al-Karak, Jordan

Abstract

In this article, we consider $k$-quasi-$\ast$-class $A$ operator $T\in\bh$ such that $TX=XS$ for some $X\in \bkh$ and prove the Fuglede-Putnam type  theorem when adjoint of $S\in\bk$ is $k$-quasi-$\ast$-class $A$ or dominant operators. Among other things, we prove that two quasisimilar  $k$-quasi-$\ast$-class $A$ operators have equal essential spectra.   

Keywords

[1] P. Aiena, Fredholm and local spectral theory with applications to multipliers, Kluwer, 2004.
[2] S.C. Arora and J.K. Thukral, On a class of operators, Glas. Math. Ser. III 21 (1986), 381–386.
[3] A. Bachir and P. Pagacz, An asymmetric Putnam-Fuglede theorem for ∗-paranormal operators, arXiv:1405.4844 (2018).
[4] E. Bishop, A duality theorem for an arbitrary operator, Pacific J. Math. 9 (1959), no. 2, 379–397.
[5] I.H. Jeon B.P. Duggal and I.H. Kim, On ∗-paranormal contractions and properties for ∗-class A operators, Linear Algebra Appl. 436 (2012), 954–962.
[6] R.G. Douglas, On majorization, factorization, and range inclusion of operators on Hilbert space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 413–415.
[7] T. Furuta, Invitation to linear operators-from matrices to bounded linear operatorsin Hilbert space, Taylor and Francis, London, 2001.
[8] B.C. Gupta, An extension of Fuglede-Putnam theorem and normality of operators, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 14, no. 11.
[9] B.C. Gupta and P.B. Ramanujan, On k-quasihyponormal operators-II, Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 83 (1981), 514–516.
[10] P.R. Halmos, A Hilbert space problem book, Springer-Verlag, 1967.
[11] J.I. Lee I.H. Jeon and A. Uchiyama, On p-quasihyponormal operators and quasisisimilarity, Math. Inequal. Appl. 6 (2003), 309–315.
[12] K. Tanahashi I.H. Jeon, I.H. Kim and A. Uchiyama, Conditions implying self-adjointness of operators, Integral Equations Operator Theory 61 (2008), 549–557.
[13] I.H. Jeon and I.H. Kim, On operators satisfying T∗|T2|T ≥ T∗|T|2T∗, Linear Algebra Appl. 418 (2006), 854–862.
[14] F. Zuo J.L. Shen and C.S. Yang, On operators satisfying T∗|T2|T ≥ T∗|T∗2|T, Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser. 26 (1976), no. 11, 2109–2116.
[15] S.M. Patel K. Tanahashi and A. Uchiyama, On extensions of some Fuglede-Putnam type theorems involving (p, k)-quasihyponormal, spectral, and dominant operators, Math. Nachr. 282 (2009), no. 7, 1022–1032.
[16] A.H. Kim and I.H. Kim, Essential spectra of quasisimilar (p, k)-quasihyponormal operators, J. Ineq. Appl. (2006), 1–7.
[17] F. Kimura, Analysis of non-normal operators via Aluthge transformation, Integral Equations Operator Theory 50 (1995), no. 3, 375–384.
[18] K.B Laursen and M.N Neumann, Introduction to local spectral theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2000.
[19] J.W. Lee and I.H. Jeon, A study on operators satisfying |T2| ≥ |T∗|2, Korean J. Math. 19 (2011), no. 1, 61–64.
[20] S. Mecheri, Isolated points of spectrum of k-quasi-∗-class A operators, Studia Math. 208 (2012), 87–96.
[21] , Fuglede-Putnam theorem for class A operators, Colloq. Math. 138 (2015), no. 2, 183–191.
[22] M. Putinar, Quasi-similarity of tuples with Bishop’s property (β), Integral Equation Operator Theory 15 (1992), 1047–1052.
[23] M. Radjabalipour, On majorization and normality of operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 62 (1977), no. 1, 105–110.
[24] M.H.M. Rashid, Class wA(s, t) operators and quasisimilarity, Port. Math. 69 (2012), no. 4, 305–320.
[25] M.H.M. Rashid, An extension of Fuglede-Putnam theorem for w-hyponormal operators, Afr. Diaspora J. Math. 14 (2012), no. 1, 106—-118.
[26]M.H.M. Rashid, Fuglede-Putnam type theorems via the generalized Aluthge transform, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fıs. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 108 (2014), no. 2, 1021—-1034.
[27]M.H.M. Rashid, On k-quasi-∗-paranormal operators, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas F´ıs. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 110(2016), no. 2, 655–666.
[28] M.H.M. Rashid, On quasi-∗-class (A, k) operators, Nonlinear Anal. Forum 22 (2017), no. 1, 45–57.
[29] M.H.M. Rashid,  Quasinormality and Fuglede-Putnam theorem for (s, p)-w-hyponormal operators, Linear Multilinear Algebra 65 (2017), no. 8, 1600–1616.
[30] M.H.M. Rashid,  Quasinormality and Fuglede-Putnam theorem for w-hyponormal operators, Thai J. Math. 15 (2017),
no. 1, 167–182.
[31] M.H.M. Rashid,  Putnam’s inequality for quasi-∗-class A operators, Acta Math. Acad. Paed. Nyıregyhaziensis 34 (2018), no. 1, 1–10.
[32] J.G. Stampfli and B.L. Wadhwa, An asymmetric Fuglede-Putnam theorem for dominant operators, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 25 (1976), 359–365.
[33] J.G. Stampfli and B.L. Wadhwa, On dominant operators, Monatsh. Math. 84 (1977), 143–153.
[34] K. Takahashi, On the converse of Fuglede-Putnam theorem, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 43 (1981), 123–125.
[35] R. Yingbin and Y. Zikun, Spectral structure and subdecomposability of p-hyponormal operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (1999), 2069–2074.
[36] T. Yoshino, Remark on the generalized Fuglede-Putnam theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 95 (1985), 571–572.
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
Volume 13, Issue 2
July 2022
Pages 863-873
  • Receive Date: 02 September 2020
  • Revise Date: 17 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 12 April 2021