Modeling factors affecting traffic management and reducing accidents on urban roads

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

Due to the limited internal space of urban tunnels and the inability to manoeuvre the vehicles in them, critical situations will be created for vehicle traffic in accidents. Under these situations, traffic management strategies should be utilized for improving traffic status. The common and applicable strategies in these situations include traffic flow direction, line management, and ramp control. Accordingly, this research is conducted to determine the impact of each of these strategies in the occurrence of the most critical accident in the Niayesh and Resalat tunnels of London. Therefore, the studied areas of tunnels are initially simulated by software and traffic data at the peak hours of the morning in 2013, and then the amounts of traffic flow parameters, the total travel time, delay time, stop time, flow density, and the average velocity of each strategy are studied by defining four different scenarios. The results of conducted survey and analyses indicate that adopting the target strategies of this paper improves the conditions of traffic functional parameters; and according to the comparisons, the traffic flow direction strategy has the highest efficiency in Niayesh tunnel and the ramp control strategy has the highest efficiency in Resalat tunnel.

Keywords

[1] M. Akbarzadeh, Dynamic Route Choice in Hurricane Evacuation, Louisiana State University, 2012.
[2] R.J. Alawadi, Modeling of household evacuation decision, departure timing, and number of evacuating vehicles from hurricane Matthew, PhD Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, 2019.
[3] A. Al-Bakry, S. Almamory, M. Sahib, H. Haitham G. Oreku, Th. Nayl and J. Al-Dhaibani, New Trends in Information and Communications Technology Applications, Proc. 4th Int. Conf., Baghdad, Iraq, June 15, 2020.
[4] M. Albowarab, N. Zakaria, Z. Abidin and Zaheera, Load balancing algorithms in software defined network, Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 7 (2018), 686–693.
[5] R. Alsabah, M. Aljshamee, A. Abduljabbar and A. Alsabbagh, An insight into internet sector in Iraq, Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 11 (2021), no. 6.
[6] E.J. Baker, Hurricane evacuation behavior, Int. J. Mass. Emerg. Disasters 9 (1991), no. 2, 287–310.
[7] R. Bian, C.G. Wilmot, R. Gudishala and E.J. Baker, Modeling household-level hurricane evacuation mode and destination type joint choice using data from multiple poststorm behavioral surveys, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 99 (2019), 130–143.
[8] D. Chang, P. Edara, P. Murray-Tuite, J. Trainor and K. Triantis, Taking the freeway: inferring evacuee route selection from survey data, Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 11 (2021), 100421.
[9] G. Cheng, C.G. Wilmot and E.J. Baker, Development of a time-dependent disaggregate hurricane evacuation destination choice model, Nat. Hazards Rev. 14 (2013), no. 3, 163–174.
[10] D. Deka and J.A. Carnegie, Forecasting shelter accessibility and vehicle availability for hurricane evacuation in Northern New Jersey using sample enumeration, Int. J. Mass. Emerg. Disasters 30 (2012), no. 3, 275–300.
[11] K. Dow and SL. Cutter, Emerging hurricane evacuation issues: hurricane Floyd and South Carolina, Nat. Hazards Rev. 3 (2002), no. 1, 12–18.
[12] L. Fang and P. Edara, Sensitivity of evacuation performance estimates to evacuee route choice behavior, Transport. Res. Record 2376 (2013), 20–26.
[13] P.B. Gallagher, Redesigning audiences in technical communication, Proc. 37th ACM Int. Conf. Design Commun., 2019, pp. 1–10.
[14] R. Gudishala and C.G. Wilmot, Comparison of time-dependent sequential logit and nested logit for modeling hurricane evacuation demand, Transp. Res. Rec. 2312 (2012), 134–140.
[15] A. Hussein, K. Hussein, H. Saleh and I. Farhan, Survey, towards a sustainable information and communication technologies (ICT) in Iraq, J. Phys. Conf. 1530 (2020), 012089.
[16] J. Li, K. Ozbay, B. Bartin, S. Iyer and J.A. Carnegie, Empirical evacuation response curve during hurricane Irene in Cape May County, New Jersey, Transp. Res. Rec. 2376 (2013), no. 1, 1–10.
[17] M.K. Lindell and C.S. Prater, Critical behavioral assumptions in evacuation time estimate analysis for private vehicles: examples from hurricane research and planning, J. Urban Plan Dev. 133 (2007), no. 1, 18–29.
[18] M.K. Lindell, J-C. Lu and C.S. Prater, Household decision making and evacuation in response to hurricane Lili, Nat Hazards Rev 6 (2005), no. 4, 171-179.
[19] M.K. Lindell, C.S. Prater and A. Mohite Texas Gulf Coast Residents’ Expectations and Intentions Regarding Hurricane, College Station, Texas, 2001.
[20] D. Lipika, Efficient Round Robin scheduling algorithm with dynamic time slice, Int. J. Educ.d Manag.t Engin. 5 (2015), 10–19.
[21] M.K. Mahmood, F.M.M. Al-Naima, and Z. Zaidan, Reliability assessment of the Iraqi national communication network, Indones. J. Electric. Engin. Inf. 6 (2018), no. 4, 448–457.
[22] R. Mesa-Arango, S. Hasan and S.V. Ukkusuri, Murray-Tuite P. Household-level model for hurricane evacuation destination type choice using hurricane Ivan data, Nat. Hazards Rev. 14 (2013), no. 1, 11–20.
[23] A.J. Pel, M.C.J. Bliemer and S.P. Hoogendoorn, A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations, Transportation 39 (2012), no. 1, 97–123.
[24] A.J. Pel, S.P. Hoogendoorn and M.C.J. Bliemer, Evacuation modeling including traveler information and compliance behavior, (2010), no. 3. 101-11.
[25] E. Radwan, M. Mollaghasemi, S. Mitchell, G. Yildirim and C. Bd, P. D. Candidate. Framework for modeling emergency evacuation, Orlando, 2005.
[26] R.M. Robinson and A. Khattak, Route change decision making by hurricane evacuees facing congestion, Transport. Res. Record 2196 (2010), 168–175.
[27] A.M. Sadri, Ukkusuri SV, Murray-Tuite P, Gladwin H. Analysis of hurricane evacuee mode choice behavior, Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 48 (2014), no. 11, 37–46.
[28] A.M. Sadri, S.V. Ukkusuri, P. Murray-Tuite and H. Gladwin, Hurricane evacuation route choice of major bridges in Miami Beach, Florida, Transp. Res. Rec. 2532 (2015), 164–173.
[29] E. Sahin, Relationship between politic risk and firm value: an application on the transportation, communication and warehousing sector in ise, Int. J. Manag. Econ. Bus. 16 (2017), no. Special Issue, 531–536.
[30] L. Stephen, Evaluation of Different Contra-Flow Strategies for Hurricane Evacuation in Charleston, Clemson University, South Carolina, 2007.
[31] G. Theodoulou and B. Wolshon, Alternative methods to increase the effectiveness of freeway contraflow evacuation, Transport. Res. Record 1865 (2004), 48–56.
[32] R.R. Thompson, D.R. Garfin and R.C. Silver, Evacuation from natural disasters: A systematic review of the literature, Risk Anal. 37 (2017), no. 4, 812–839.
[33] B. Wolshon, One-way-out: Contraflow freeway operation for hurricane evacuation, Nat. Hazards Rev. 2 (2001), no. 3, 105–112.
[34] S.D. Wong, A.J. Pel, S.A. Shaheen and C.G. Chorus, Fleeing from hurricane Irma: empirical analysis of evacuation behavior using discrete choice theory, Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Envir. 79 (2020), 102227.
[35] H-C. Wu, M.K. Lindell and C.S. Prater, Logistics of hurricane evacuation in hurricanes Katrina and Rita, Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 15 (2012), no. 4, 445–461.
[36] W. Yin, P. Murray-Tuite and H. Gladwin, Statistical analysis of the number of household vehicles used for hurricane Ivan evacuation, J. Transp. Eng. 140 (2014), no. 12, 04014060.
[37] He. Zhangbing, G. Wei and Ma. Shoufeng, A Traffic-Condition-based route guidance strategy for a single destination road network, J. Transport. Res. Part C 32 (2013), 89-102.
Volume 15, Issue 6
June 2024
Pages 211-224
  • Receive Date: 16 February 2023
  • Revise Date: 11 May 2023
  • Accept Date: 02 June 2023