Investigating the impact of employees' personality on the dimensions of "organizational communication, employee vitality, job attractiveness and human resources development" in the model of job attachment in the Iranian Ports and Maritime Organization

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Public Administration, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Public Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

What has been followed in this research is to investigate the impact of employees' personalities on the dimensions of ``organizational communication, employee vitality, job attractiveness and human resources development'' in the pattern of job attachment in Iran's Ports and Maritime Organization.  The research method in this research is a mixed-exploratory research method. In this research, first, the theme analysis method and then in the quantitative part, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and structural equations were used. Finally, a theoretical model was used. Research is presented.  In the method of thematic analysis, 15 interviews were conducted with the experts of the Iranian Ports and Maritime Organization, and according to the coding of the interviews and the determination of the primary and secondary codes, the attachment model of the employees was extracted and then by factor analysis and with the help of software PLS22 was validated and finalized. In the quantitative part, the use of questionnaires, and questionnaires were collected and analyzed with the statistical population of 450 employees of that organization, including experts and organizational managers and a sample number of 205. As a result, this model was presented with 14 dimensions and 43 components. The dimensions of the model were: the roles of managers, meritocracy, job attractiveness, strategies, respect for employees, development of human resources, structure and organization, organizational communication, positive organizational image, learning organization, participation system, organizational knowledge of people, compensation system Service and vitality of employees. According to the output of the Max QDI software, among these dimensions, meritocracy and human resources development by 100% and organizational knowledge of people by 18.2% occupy the highest and lowest percentages of the coding space of the interviews, respectively. And based on the output of Smart PLS software, the participation system has the highest factor load (0.807) and the learning organization has the lowest factor load (0.463). Based on factor analysis, five personality factors affect the dimensions of organizational communication, human resource development, vitality and job attractiveness in the employee attachment model.

Keywords

[1] U.A. Agarwal and V. Gupta, Relationships between job characteristics, work engagement, conscientiousness and managers’ turnover intentions: A moderated-mediation analysis, Person. Rev. 47 (2018), no. 2, 353–377.
[2] B. Ahadi and A. Fathi, Investigation of psychological factors affecting the job performance of employees, East Azarbaijan Admin. Sci. Quart. 4 (2013), no. 15, 63–78.
[3] S.H. Alavi, F. Farzan, M. Dousti, and M. Loghmani, Designing the organizational creativity based on job characteristics and job involvement among physical education units’ employees of Technology University, Int. J. Appl. Exercise Physio. 6 (2017), no. 3, 91–102.
[4] G.W. Allport and H.S. Odbert, Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study, Psycho. Monographs 47 (1936), no. 1, i.
[5] M. Azin, Investigating the ways of increasing the organizational belonging of employees in intelligence organizations, Police Protect. Secur. Quart. 12 (2016), no. 45, 47–72.
[6] A.B. Bakker and E. Demerouti, Towards a model of work engagement, Career Dev. Int. 13 (2008), no. 3, 209–223.
[7] H. Barmaki, P.M. Korosh, and M. Kalantari, Providing model of job engagement based on personality characteristics with mediating social and organizational supports in schools of Tehran city, J. Soc. Psycho. 7 (2018), no. 53, 13–23.
[8] G.M. Breakwell, S.E. Hammond, C.E. Fife-Schaw, and J.A. Smith, Research Methods in Psychology, Sage Publications, Inc, 2006.
[9] A. Carmeli, Exploring determinants of job involvement: An empirical test among senior executives, Int. J. Manpower 26 (2005), no. 5, 457–472.
[10] H.J. Eysenck, Dimensions of Personality, London: Methuen, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1947. 
[11] A.A. Fani, A. Isa Khani, and H. Danai Fard, Explaining the antecedents of belonging to work, Public Manag. Res. 16 (2012), no. 5, 23–38.
[12] B.A. Greene, R.B. Miller, H.M. Crowson, B.L. Duke, and K.L. Akey, Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation, Contemp. Educ. Psycho. 29 (2004), no. 4, 462–482.
[13] K. Habibpour Getabi and R. Safavi Shali, A comprehensive guide to using SPSS in survey research, Loya Motafkaran Publishing House, Tehran, 2015.
[14] A.Y. Haruna and G. Marthandan, Foundational competencies for enhancing work engagement in SMEs Malaysia, J. Workplace Learn. 29 (2017), no. 3, 165–184.
[15] S.M. Hashemi, Chemistry of Management, Industrial Management Organization Publications, Tehran, 2015.
[16] E. Haugsnes, Investigating the effect of organizational climate on work engagement, Master’s thesis, University Oslo, 2016.
[17] A. Isa Khani, A.A. Fani, and H. Danaei Fard, Explaining the consequences of work belonging and its impact on organizational commitment, Quart. J. Manag. Res. Iran 16 (2012), no. 2, 151–166.
[18] H. Jalilian, Investigating the effect of individual and organizational factors on employees’ organizational attachment, Organ. Behav.Stud. Quart. 6 (2016), no. 3, 105–132.
[19] W.A Kahn, Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Acad. Manag. J. 33 (1990), no. 4, 692–724.
[20] O. Keng Boon, V. Arumugam, M. Samaun Safa, and N. Abu Bakar, Hrm and TQM: association with job involvement, Person. Rev. 36 (2007), no. 6, 939–962.
[21] S. Khorshid and H. Yazdani, Studying the relationship between trust and sense of organizational belonging considering the moderating effect of organizational commitment, Change Manag. Res. J. 4 (2019), no. 7.
[22] N. King, C. Horrocks, and J. Brooks, Interviews in Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications, 2019.
[23] P. Kline, An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis, Samt Publications, Tehran, 2001.
[24] E.E. Lawler and D.T. Hall, Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation., J. Appl. Psycho. 54 (1970), no. 4, 305.
[25] Y.S. Lincoln, E.G. Guba, and J.J. Pilotta, Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
[26] R.A. McCloy and L.L. Wise, Invited reaction: The effects of personality, affectivity, and work commitment on motivation to improve work through learning, Human Resource Dev. Quart. 13 (2002), no. 4, 377.
[27] R.R. McCrae and P.T. Costa Jr, Discriminant validity of NEO-PIR facet scales, Educ. Psycho. Measure. 52 (1992), no. 1, 229–237.
[28] B. Modrek and C.J. Lee, Alternative splicing in the human, mouse and rat genomes is associated with an increased frequency of exon creation and/or loss, Nature Genetics 34 (2003), no. 2, 177–180.
[29] F.H. Mohsin, The linkage between career growth, work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior: An insight, Int. J. Sci. Res. Pub. 5 (2015), no. 5, 1–4.
[30] W.O.Z. Muizu, The influence of personality on employee engagement and emotional intelligence (an empirical study on employees of rural banks in West Java, Indonesia), South East Asia J. Contemp. Bus. Econ. Law 12 (2017), no. 2, 2289–1560.
[31] D.W. Organ, P.M. Podsakoff, and S.B. MacKenzie, Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences, Foundations for Organizational Science, SAGE Publications, 2005.
[32] A.M. Saks, Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement, J. Manag. Psycho. 21 (2006), no. 7, 600–619.
[33] W.B. Schaufeli and A.B. Bakker, Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study, J. Organi. Behav.: Int. J. Ind. Occupat. Organ. Psycho. Behav. 25 (2004), no. 3, 293–315. [34] G.H. Seijts and D. Crim, What engages employees the most or, the ten c’s of employee engagement, Ivey Bus. J. 70 (2006), no. 4, 1–5.
[35] M. Soodani, F. Mostafavirad, and M. Chinaveh, Assessing the simple and multiple relationships between individual and organizational variables and job involvement among nurses, Quart. J. Nurs. Manag. 4 (2016), no. 3, 42–53.
[36] L. Tisu, D. Lupsa, D. Vırga, and A. Rusu, Personality characteristics, job performance and mental health: The mediating role of work engagement, Person. Individ. Differ. 153 (2020), 109644.
[37] F.O. Ugwu, Are good morals often reciprocated? Perceptions of organizational virtuousness and optimism as predictors of work engagement, Asian J. Soc. Sci. Human. 1 (2012), no. 3, 188–198.
[38] J.T. Zinger and N.J. O’Reilly, An examination of sports sponsorship from a small business perspective, Int. J. Sports Market. Sponsorship 11 (2010), no. 4, 14–32.
Volume 15, Issue 6
June 2024
Pages 295-311
  • Receive Date: 24 June 2022
  • Revise Date: 09 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 21 August 2022