Formulating the corporate governance model in the banking system using the Delphi technique: A risk reduction viewpoint

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Management, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran

2 Department of Management, Faculty of Human Sciences, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran

Abstract

Recent financial crises revealed the high vulnerability of the banking system as a complex system for financial transactions. Investigating the causes of the collapse of some large banks shows that each country's banking structure and system requires a corporate governance model suited to the country's economic, political, and cultural models to gain further success. This study aims to formulate a corporate governance model for the Iranian banking system As an Islamic banking system. A future study was conducted using the Delphi method in three phases, with 28 experts in banking and governance strategic studies. In the first phase, one question is applied to identify the most important factors affecting the corporate governance suited to the Iranian banking system based on a risk reduction viewpoint. In the second and third phases, a self-made questionnaire was used based on the results of the first phase to collect the experts’ opinions and provide a consensus. According to the results, 30 effective factors were extracted and classified into six groups, including the effectiveness of the internal controls, the effectiveness of the structure and characteristics of the board of directors, quality of disclosure, responsiveness, optimal risk management, and effectiveness of the ownership structure. The corporate governance model, specific to the Iranian banking system, was also formulated and validated using the findings.

Keywords

[1] A.M. Abu-Tapanjeh, Corporate governance from the Islamic perspective: A comparative analysis with OECD principles, Critic. Perspect. Account. 20 (2009), 556–567.
[2] M. Ahmadi and D. Demory, The effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the relationship between systematic risk and the performance of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Faculty Manag. Account., Yazd University, 2015.
[3] D. Aikman, M. Galesic, G. Girerenzer, K. Kapida, K. Katsikopoulos, A. Kothiyal, E. Murphy, and T. Neuman, Taking uncertainty seriously: simplicity versus complexity in financial regulation, Bank of England Financial Stability Paper No. (2014), 28.
[4] P. Andres and E. Vallelado, Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors, J. Bank. Finance 32 (2008), 2570–2580.
[5] G. Bai and E. Elyasiani, Bank stability and managerial compensation, J. Bank. Finance 37 (2012), 799–813.
[6] B. Bidabad A. Amirostovar, and M. Sherafat, Financial transparency, corporate governance and information disclosure of the entrepreneur’s corporation in Rastin banking, Int. J. Law Manag. 59 (2017), 636–651.
[7] A. Burki and A. Shabir, Bank governance changes in Pakistan: Is there a performance effect?, J. Econ. Bus. 62 (2010), 129–146.
[8] P. Chillar and R.V. Lellapalli, Divergence or convergence: paradoxes in corporate governance?, Corp. Govern. 15 (2015), 693–705.
[9] G. Chitan, Corporate governance and bank performance in the Romanian banking sector, Procedia Econ. Finance 3 (2012), 554–549.
[10] R. Crespi, M.A. Garcia-Cestona, and V. Salas, Governance mechanisms in Spanish banks. Does ownership matter?, J. Bank. Finance 28 (2004), no. 10, 2311–2330.
[11] M. Eling and S. Marek, Corporate governance and risk Taking: Evidence from the U.K. and German Insurance Markets, J. Risk Insurance 81 (2014), no. 3, 653–682.
[12] K. Eslamloueyan, H. Yazdanpanah, and Z. Khalilnezhad, The existence of a risk-taking channel of monetary policy transmission in Iran’s banking system, Econ. Model. Res. 9 (2017), no. 31, 7–40.
[13] M. Ghasemi Aliabadi and A. Nasiri Aghdam, Introducing the appropriate model for measuring the corporate governance index in the usury-free banking system (its calculation in a sample bank), Res. Econ. Polic. 26 (2017), no. 87, 77–116.
[14] A. Khodamipour, M. Baharmghaddam, and I. Rahmani, Investigating the relationship between institutional investment, risk, performance and corporate governance in financial companies, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, 2014.
[15] H. Koerniadi, C. Krishnamurti, and A. Tourani Rad, Corporate governance and risk taking in New Zealand, Aust. J. Manag. 39 (2014), no. 2, 227–245.
[16] P. Madras, Investigating risk management in Islamic banking and conventional banking, Bank Salary 1 (2011), 115.
[17] M. Mohammadi, and M. Motahari Nasab, Comparative comparison of public accountability of public and private banks in Iran, Int. Conf. Manag. Econ. 21st Century, 2014.
[18] G. Liang, C. Smallman, and J. Radford, A critique of corporate governance in China, Int. J. Law Manag. 55 (2013), 257–272.
[19] I. Ofoeda, Corporate governance and non-bank financial institutions profitability, Int. J. Law Manag. 59 (2017), 854–875.
[20] F. Rezaei and M. Sobhani, Optimizing the performance of companies using corporate governance mechanisms and using innovative algorithms, Dev. Transform. Manag. 22 (2014), 19–28.
[21] M. Sadeghi Shahabi and M.I. Agha Babaei, Comparative analysis of credit risk in Islamic banking and conventional banking, Islamic Financ. Res. 1 (2011), 89.
[22] R. Saggar and B. Singh, Corporate governance and risk reporting: Indian evidence, Manag. Audit. J. 32 (2017), 378–405.
[23] A. Shabir and O, Rosmini, Basic corporate governance models: A systematic review, Int. J. Law Manag. 58 (2016), 73–107.
[24] M. Taghavi, A. Ahmadian, and M. Kianvand, An analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the stability of the banking system of developing countries (with an emphasis on the bank ownership index), Financ. Knowledge Secur. Anal. 6 (2012), no. 19, 45–66.
[25] N. Yazdinia and B. Azami, Investigating the relationship between performance and corporate governance of banks and affiliated companies (Case study of five areas of management and finance), Financ. Account. Knowledge 4 (2016), no. 2, 53–76.
Volume 15, Issue 7
July 2024
Pages 43-50
  • Receive Date: 15 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 10 April 2023
  • Accept Date: 26 April 2023