Fuzzy Dematel approach to determining interrelationship factors affecting industrial enterprise performance

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Tehran-Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Finance, Yasuj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yasuj, Iran

3 Department of Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Technology and Innovation Monitoring, National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Today, in the competitive global economy, evaluating the financial performance of companies is very important not only for current and potential managers, creditors, and investors but also for companies operating in a sector. Evaluating the financial performance of companies is very important not only for current and potential managers, creditors and investors but also for companies active in a sector. The purpose of this research was to identify and prioritize the key factors affecting the company's financial performance. Therefore, by using the Fuzzy Dematel approach and gathering the opinions of experts with a pairwise comparison questionnaire, the relationship between the indicators affecting the enterprise's financial performance has been discussed. The results showed Asset Management (WCC) has the most Prominence and interaction with other criteria and since $(D_i-R_i)$ is negative for this factor, so this criterion is a net effect. Asset Management (OE) after Asset Management (WCC) has the most interaction with other criteria and since $(D_i-R_i)$ is negative for this factor, so this criterion is a net effect. The income statement is net cause for $(D_i-R_i)$ is positive for this factor.

Keywords

[1] R.S. Allen, G. Dawson, K. Wheatley, and C.S. White, Perceived diversity and organizational performance, Employee Rel. 30 (2008), no. 1, 20–33.
[2] A. Andrea, P. Jafari, and M. Behifar, The impediments to student engagement: A hybrid method based on fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy DEMATEL, World J. Educ. 10 (2020), no. 5.
[3] M.Y.N. Attari, M. Ahmadi, A. Ala, and E. Moghadamnia, RSDM-AHSnet: Designing a robust stochastic dynamic model to allocating health service network under disturbance situations with limited capacity using algorithms NSGA-II and PSO, Comput. Biol. Med. 147 (2022), 105649.
[4] N. Bashirimanesh, Function of economic value-added criterion in Tehran stock exchange, Account. J. 173 (2006).
[5] M. Chand, K. India, and A.A. Katou, The impact of HRM practices on organisational performance in the Indian hotel industry, Employee Rel. 29 (2007), no. 6, 576–594.
[6] G. Chen, M. Firth, D.N. Gao, and O.M. Rui, Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China, J. Corp. Finance 12 (2006), no. 3, 424–448.
[7] Z.C. Chen, D. Ong, and R. Sheremeta, Competition between and within universities: Theoretical and experimental investigation of group identity and the desire to win, J. Econ. Psycho. 73 (2022), no. 1, 358–365.
[8] B.E. Dollery and A.C. Worthington, The evaluation of public policy: Normative economic theories of government failure, J. Interdiscip. Econ. 7 (1996), 27–39.
[9] I. Ertugrul and N. Karakasoglu, Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods, Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (2009), no. 1, 702–715.
[10] K. Fernandes, V. Raja and A. Whalley, Lessons from implementing the balanced scorecard in a small and medium-sized manufacturing organization, Technovation 26 (2006), 623–634.
[11] J.W. Fredrickson, The strategic decision process and organizational structure, Acad. Manag. Rev. 11 (1986), no. 2, 280–297.
[12] S. Gerschewski and S.S. Xiao, Beyond financial indicators: An assessment of the measurement of performance for international new ventures, Int. Bus. Rev. 24 (2015), no. 4, 615–629.
[13] M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann and I.H. Witten, The WEKA data mining software: an update, ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsletter 11 (2009), no. 1, 10–18.
[14] A. Hosseini, Review of relation between MVA and EVA and ROA, MS Thesis, Alzahra University, 2005.
[15] P. Kangis, D. Gordon, and S. Williams, Organisational climate and corporate performance: an empirical investigation, Manag. Decis. 38 (2000), no. 8, 531–540.
[16] A. Khandekar and A. Sharma, Organizational learning and performance: Understanding Indian scenario in present global context, Educ. Train. 48 (2006), no. 8/9, 682–692.
[17] H. Makhmali, A. Sohrabi, E. Moghadamnia, and M. Behifar, Assessment of the function of time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) pattern compared to traditional costing in eHealth services, J. Strat. Manag. Stud. 8
(2017), no. 30, 109–125.
[18] R.C. Moyer, J.R. Mc Guigan, and W.J. Kretlow, Contemporary Financial Management, USA: West Publishing Company, 1992.
[19] M. Namazi and S. Khajavi, Profitability of accounting variables in prediction of systematic risk in registered companies in Tehran stock exchange, Account. Audit. Invest. J. 11 (2004), no. 38.
[20] M. Namazi and N. Rostami, Review of the relation between financial ratios and rate of return on stock and registered companies in Tehran stock exchange, Account. Audit. Invest. J. 44 (2006), 105–127.
[21] A.D. Neely, C. Adams, and M. Kennerley, The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success, London: Prentice Hall Financial Times, 2002.
[22] T. Ozcan and F. Tuysuz, Modified grey relational analysis integrated with grey Dematel approach for the performance evaluation of retail stores, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 15 (2016), no. 2, 353–386.
[23] R.G. Rajan and Z. Luigi, What do we know about capital structure some evidence from international data, J. Finance 50 (1995), no. 5, 1421–1460.
[24] N.A. Ramli, H. Latan and G.T. Solovida, Determinants of capital structure and firm financial performance—A PLS-SEM approach: Evidence from Malaysia and Indonesia, Quart. Rev. Econ. Finance 71 (2019), 148–160.
[25] B. Shoghi and A. Hajfathali, The intermediary effect of enterprise culture on relation between leadership style of the managers and personnel creativity (Case study: Head office of an insurance company in Markazi province and Lorestan), World Insurance News 173 (2012), 23–44.
[26] T. Song, M. Chen, Y. Xu, D. Wang, X. Song, and X. Tang, Competition-guided multi-neighborhood local search algorithm for the university course timetabling problem, Appl. Soft Comput. 11 (2021), no. 3, 607–624.
[27] J.J. Thakkar, Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Springer, Singapore, 2021.
[28] N. Venkatraman and V. Ramanujam, Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches, Acad. Manag. Rev. 11 (1986), no. 4, 801–814.
[29] N. Yalcin, A. Bayrakdaroglu, and C. Kahraman, Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries, Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), no. 1, 350–364.
[30] C. Zehir, E. Can, and T. Karaboga, Linking entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The role of differentiation strategy and innovation performance, Proc.-Soc. Behav. Sci. 210 (2015), 358–367.
Volume 15, Issue 8
August 2024
Pages 313-322
  • Receive Date: 11 March 2023
  • Revise Date: 08 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 17 July 2023