International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications

Presenting the development model of technological entrepreneurship in the banking system based on the open innovation approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

2 Electricity and Information Technology Research Institute, Scientific and Industrial Research Organization of Iran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to present a model of technological entrepreneurship development in the banking system based on the open innovation approach. The current research has a fundamental goal and a practical approach, and the research method is mixed and content analysis. The statistical population of the qualitative section includes professors and experts in the field of technological entrepreneurship, and the sampling method in this research is a snowball sampling method, so that the data collection continued until reaching the saturation point, which is 18 people. and also the statistical population in the quantitative part includes managers and assistants of Tejarat Bank in Tehran province, and the sampling method in this research is simple random, and the sample size is 313 people based on Morgan's table. The method and tools of data collection in the qualitative part are semi-structured interviews and in the quantitative part are researcher-made questionnaires. In this research, descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data and achieve the aforementioned goals. Statistical methods for analyzing and analyzing the information available in the data set is factor analysis or factor analysis, which was used using the structural equation method (SEM) and Lisrel software. Finally, the research model was measured and fitted. The research results showed that the fit of the research model is significant for t-coefficients above ±1.96 to ±2.58 at the 0.05 level, and t-coefficients above ±2.58 are significant at the 0.01 level. The path coefficients and the explained variance of the research variables and the fit indices obtained for the tested model show that the RMSEA index in the estimated model has an acceptable level with a rate of 0.064 and other fit indices such as CFI, GFI, NFI, and AGFI is equal to 0.97, 0.94, 0.95 and 0.92, respectively, and these characteristics of good fit show that the data of this research fits well with the factor structure of this model.

Keywords

[1] A. Ahari Lahagh, A. Badi’zadeh, A. Davari, and J. Mehrabi, Presenting the model of open innovation in small and medium-sized businesses based on the approach of the level of social interactions with the medium of innovation (case study: small and medium-sized businesses of information technology and banking communication), Sci. Res. Quart. Soc. Sci. 13 (2019), no. 1.
[2] A. Ahmadian, H. Haji Hosseini, and M.S. Baradaran, An introduction to technological entrepreneurship in biotechnology, J. Industr. Technol. Dev. 10 (2013), no. 20.
[3] M. Akbari, E. Zareh Parvar Shoja, H. Padash, and S. Alizadeh Moghaddam, The effect of inbound and outbound innovation on innovation performance in information and communication technology companies, Technol. Dev. Manag. 6 (2018), no. 3.
[4] M. Asadullah, R. Sanavi Fard, and A. Hamidi Zadeh, Design of open banking business model in the light of open innovation, Strat. Manag. Stud. 12 (2021), no. 45, 245–268.
[5] G. Azar and F. Ciabuschi, Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness, Int. Bus. Rev. 26 (2017), no. 2, 324–336.
[6] V. Barba-S´anchez and C. Atienza-Sahuquillo, Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education, Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 24 (2018), no. 1.
[7] R.A. Burgelman and R.S. Rosenbloom, Design and Implementation of Technology Strategy: An Evolutionary Perspective, Division of Research, Harvard Business School, 1997.
[8] H. Chesbrough, The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 44 (2003), no. 3, 35.
[9] P. Drucker and J. Maciariello, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Routledge, 2014.
[10] M.-Y. Garc´ıa-Vidales, G. Maldonado-Guzm´an, and S.-Y. Pinz´on-Castro, The influence of open innovation practices on business performance in Mexican family and non-family SMEs, Estud. Gerenc. 35 (2019), no. 153, 370–378.
[11] S.R. Hijazi, K. Talebi, and E. Mohammadi Daniyali, Identifying the factors affecting the quality to introduce technological entrepreneurship opportunities, a case study of dairy industries, Modern Econ. Trade 6 (2018), no. 24, 135–156.
[12] A. Hosseini and F. Shams, The effect of positive organizational behavior and open innovation on improving competitive advantage, Manag. Stud. (Improv. Transform.) 23 (2013), no. 75, 137–159.
[13] S. Hutton, R. Demir, and S. Eldridge, How does open innovation contribute to the firm’s dynamic capabilities?, Technovation 106 (2021), 102288.
[14] D. Johnson, J.B. Craig, and R. Hildebrand, Entrepreneurship education: towards a discipline-based framework, J. Manag. Dev. 25 (2006), no. 1, 40–54.
[15] S. Khavari, F. Serajiand, and M.R. Yousefzadeh Chosari, The characteristics of technological entrepreneurship curriculum in elementary school, Curric. Stud. J. 18 (2023), no. 68.
[16] R. Martin-Rojas, V.J. Garcia-Morales, and N. Gonzalez-Alvarez, Technological antecedents of entrepreneurship and its consequences for organizational performance, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 147 (2019), 22–35.
[17] V. Mazidi, A. Moghaddasi, R. Samiei, and M. Ashrafi, Presenting the model of technological entrepreneurship in schools of Golestan province, J. Educ. Leadership Admin. 14 (2020), no. 4.
[18] T. Obradovic, B. Vlacic, and M. Dabic, Open innovation in the manufacturing industry: A review and research agenda, Technovation 102 (2021), 102221.
[19] X. Peng, X. Ni and C. Yao, The influence of governance form on the utility of corporate technological entrepreneurship activities—An empirical studies on Chinese bio-pharmaceutical industry, 4th IEEE Int. Conf. Manag. Innov. Technol., IEEE, 2008, pp. 576–581.
[20] G. Ramezampour Nargesi, A. Davari, R. Afrasiyabi, and B. Zargaran Yazd, Investigating the impact of internal and external factors on open innovation (case study: research centers of the ministry of industries and sciences), Technol. Dev. Manag. 2 (2013), no. 1, 29–46.
[21] G. Ramezampour Nargesi, S. Ramezampour Nargesi, and A. Ghafari, Key factors affecting the development of technological entrepreneurship in knowledge-based companies located in science and technology parks in Iran, Entrepreneur. Dev. 8 (2014), no. 4, 749–766.
[22] F. Rezaei, Investigating the relationship between knowledge management system, innovation capacity and open innovation (case study: Kermanshah National Bank), Third Int. Conf. Manag. Human. Res., 2017.
[23] A. Rezaeian, Principles of Organization and Management, Samt Publication, 2015. [In Persisn]
[24] M. Rezvani, J. Yadollahi Farsi, and M.S. Baradaran, Designing a conceptual model of technological entrepreneurship: A case study of a passenger transportation telecommunication technology organization, New Econ. Trade Mag. 6 (2013), no. 23–24, 89–110.
[25] M.H. Saber Kohneh Gourabi, S.H. Iranmanesh, and P. Jafari, Presenting a technological entrepreneurship model with an open innovation approach in Iran’s knowledge-based oil and gas companies, Program Dev. Res. J. 2 (2021), no. 3.
[26] S. Shan, Y. Jia, X. Zheng and X. Xu, Assessing relationship and contribution of China’s technological entrepreneurship to socio-economic development, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 135 (2018), 83–90.
[27] A. Sivam, T. Dieguez, L.P. Ferreira and F.J.G. Silva, Key settings for successful open innovation arena, J. Comput. Design Engin. 6 (2019), no. 4, 507–515.
[28] J. Soluk, N. Kammerlander and S. Darwin, Digital entrepreneurship in developing countries: The role of institutional voids, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 170 (2021), 120876.
[29] Y. Yang, G. Brosch, B. Yang, and T. Cadden, Dissemination and communication of lessons learned for a project-based business with the application of information technology: a case study with Siemens, Prod. Plann. Control 31 (2020), no. 4, 273–286.
[30] S.A. Zahra and A.P. Nielsen, Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization, Strat. Manag. J. 23 (2002), no. 5, 377–398.
[31] X. Zhang, Z. Chu, L. Ren, and J. Xing, Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 186 (2023), 122114.
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
Volume 16, Issue 2
February 2025
Pages 293-312
  • Receive Date: 20 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 16 September 2023