Analytical investigation of five-junction solar cell behavior based on Ge layers and InAlGaAs and InAlGaP alloys

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

2 Smart Microgrid Research Center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Abstract

In recent years, we have witnessed significant advancements in the production of solar cells with a reduction in cost and an increase in their efficiency. One of the stages in creating advancements in new cells is evaluating their performance under different conditions using simulations before their fabrication. In this article, the structure of a multi-junction solar cell composed of Ge layers, InAlGaAs alloys, and InAlGaP alloys will be comprehensively examined. To achieve the highest efficiency, the lowest absorbing layer of the solar cell (Ge solar cell) will initially be optically simulated and then electrically simulated. After optimizing the Ge solar cell, the intermediate layers between the cells (tunnel junctions) and then the upper absorbing layers will be optimized in sequence. Optimization of solar cells in each absorbing layer refers to selecting the appropriate thickness, impurity density, and molar percentage of the layers to achieve the highest efficiency. According to simulation results, an efficiency of over 49\% has been achieved for the 5-junction cell.

Keywords

[1] S. Adachi, Band gaps and refractive indices of AlGaAsSb, GaInAsSb, and InPAsSb: Key properties for a variety of the 2-4 um optoelectronic device applications, J. Appl. Phys. 61 (1987), no. 10, 4896–4876.
[2] A. Bates, Novel optimization techniques for multijunction solar cell design using Silvaco ATLAS, Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2003.
[3] F. Dimroth, High-efficiency solar cells from III-V compound semiconductors, Phys. Stat. Sol. (c) 3 (2006), 373–379.
[4] S. Dubey, J.N. Sarvaiya, and B. Seshadri, Temperature dependent photovoltaic (PV) efficiency and its effect on PV production in the world, Energy Proc. 33 (2013), 311–321.
[5] J.F. Geisz, R.M. France, K.L. Schulte, M.A. Steiner, A.G. Norman, H.L. Guthrey, M.R. Young, T. Song, and T. Moriarty, Six-junction III–V solar cells with 47.1% conversion efficiency under 143 Suns concentration, Nature Energy 5 (2020), no. 4, 326–335.
[6] J.F. Geisz, M.A. Steiner, N. Jain, K.L. Schulte, R.M. France, W.E. McMahon, E.E. Perl, K.A. Horowitz, and D.J. Friedman, Pathway to 50% efficient inverted metamorphic concentrator solar cells, AIP Conf. Proc. 1881 (2017), no. 1.
[7] S. Inc., Atlas Manual, Silvaco Inc., 2010.
[8] E.F. Fernandez, A.J. Garcıa-Loureiro and G.P. Smestad, Multijunction concentrator solar cells: Analysis and fundamentals, P. P´erez-Higueras and E. Fernandez, (eds) High concentrator photovoltaics, Green Energy and Technology, Springer, Cham, 2015.
[9] A.W. Walker, O. Theriault, M.M. Wilkins, J.F. Wheeldon and K. Hinzer, Tunnel-junction-limited multifunction solar cell performance over-concentration, IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. 19 (2013), no. 5, 1–8.
[10] X. Zhang, S. Huang, J. Liu, K. Lin, Y. Wang, and W. Yang, Research on monolithic Al-GaInP/AlGaInAs/GaInAs/Ge quadruple-junction solar cell for high-efficiency lattice-matched tandem photovoltaic device, Appl. Phys. Express 13 (2020), no. 7, 071002.
Volume 16, Issue 3
March 2025
Pages 323-329
  • Receive Date: 27 January 2024
  • Accept Date: 29 April 2024