Designing the content of the third grade elementary math textbook based on the integrated curriculum and evaluating its effect on students' integrated learning: A mixed study

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Administration and Education Planning, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the present two studies is to design an integrated content of the third-grade elementary math textbook using a quantitative approach in the first study, and in the second study, to assess the effect on students' integrated learning. In this study, the qualitative part used the qualitative content analysis method and the quantitative part applied the quasi-experimental method of pre-test and post-test design with a control group. In the qualitative section, a sample of 18 expert teachers from Izeh was selected using the purposive sampling method. In the quantitative section, a sample of 30 people was selected by a simple random sampling method. The statistical population of the quantitative section is all primary school male students in Izeh City. In this study, first a conceptual model was designed, then using qualitative content analysis and the interview tool, the participants 'opinions on the possibility of linking the content of the math textbook with three third-grade elementary textbooks were extracted and then the effect of this content on students' learning was compared with three third grade textbooks. The results show a kind of unity of sciences with a significant difference between integrated learning of students who have been trained with integrated content and students who have not been trained with integrated content, and the level of significance is less than 0.05, indicating that integrated content is based on integrated learning, with integration playing a very important role.

Keywords

[1] P. Ahmadi, An analysis of the multiplicity and diversity of the concept of integration in the field of curriculum, Quart. J. Res. Plann. Higher Educ. 9 (2003), no. 3, 87–124.
[2] P. Ahmadi, Curriculum Content Design and Organization: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Integrated Curriculum, vol. 1, Ayiz, Tehran, 2013. MR 9789649703053
[3] V. Anghelache and C.C. Bentea, Integrated teaching–the new curricular design of pre-primary educational system in Romania, Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 51 (2012), 125–129.
[4] H.S. Atwa and E.M. Gouda, Curriculum integration in medical education: A theoretical review, Intel. Prop. Rights 2 (2014), 3.
[5] G. Bagyinszki and E. Bitay, Organization of curriculum and education in technical training, Papers Tech. Sci. 11 (2019), 23–26.
[6] A. Banerjee, J. Dolado, and R. Mestre, Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework, J, Time Ser. Anal. 19 (1998), no. 3, 267–283.
[7] K.H. Becker and K. Park, Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) subjects on students’ learning: A meta-analysis, 2011.
[8] K.C. Costley, Research supporting integrated curriculum: Evidence for using this method of instruction in public school classrooms, Online Submission (2015).
[9] E.R. Elam and H.E. Spotts, Achieving marketing curriculum integration: A live case study approach, J. Market. Educ. 26 (2004), no. 1, 50–65.
[10] F. Evers and J. Wolstenholme, Integrating knowledge, skills, and values into the curriculum development process at the University of Guelph-Humber, New Direct. Teach. Learn. 2007 (2007), no. 112, 83–91.
[11] A.A. Glatthorn, F. Boschee, B.M. Whitehead, and B.F. Boschee, Curriculum Leadership: Strategies for Development and Implementation, SAGE publications, 2018.
[12] T. Hashemnejad, M. Khanjarkhani, and A. Heidarzadegan, The effect of the curriculum integration approach on the academic achievement of fourth grade female students in Khash City, J. Educ. Psycho. Stud. 16 (2019), no. 33, 171–198.
[13] P. Kantamara, P. Hallinger, and M. Jatiket, Scaling-up educational reform in Thailand: Context, collaboration, networks, and change, Plann. Chang. 37 (2006), 5–23.
[14] H. Maleki, Introduction to Curriculum Planning, Samt, Tehran, 2016.
[15] Y. Mehralizadeh, M. Safai Moghadam, I. Salehi Omran, and M.R. Alam, Theoretical and practical foundations of research (quantitative, qualitative and mixed), Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 2013.
[16] M. Mehromhammadi, Basic studies on policy development of interdisciplinary sciences in higher education from the perspective of developmental process, Quart. J. Interdiscip. Stud. Human. 88 (2004), no. 3, 1–18.
[17] S. Nikitina, Three strategies for interdisciplinary teaching: Contextualizing, conceptualizing, and problem-centring, J. Curric. Stud. 38 (2006), no. 3, 251–271.
[18] H.H. Pesaran and Y. Shin, Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models, Econ. Lett. 58 (1998), no. 1, 17–29.
[19] M. Piri and K. Behrouzi, Feasibility study of school-based curriculum planning in the curriculum planning system from the perspective of educational experts, Sci. Res. J. Curric. Res. 5 (2015), no. 2, 1–22.
[20] S.A. Razavi, Generalities and Principles of Curriculum Planning, vol. 3, Behta Pajuhesh, Isfahan, 2013.
[21] P.L. Shrestha and A.F. Blumberg, Cohesive sediment transport, Encycloped. Coastal Sci. (2005), 327–330.
[22] R.J. Todd, Curriculum Integration (Learning in a Changing World), Australian Council for Educational Research, 2010.
Volume 16, Issue 4
April 2025
Pages 285-293
  • Receive Date: 26 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 15 October 2022