International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications

The explanation of the role of management audit information in the strategy development process based on the actors-network approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Finance and Accounting, Emirates Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, UAE

2 Department of Finance and Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Accounting, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Increasing attention to the role of information and communication and social factors as well as sociology in all sciences is considered one of the effective infrastructures in development growth and prosperity in every science. Accounting and auditing as knowledge, experience and skills that are always on the path of growth, from the two perspectives of knowledge and professionalism, are always intertwined in various dimensions with the surrounding environment and society of the organizations and companies and on the path of evolution, progress, construction and interaction are in communication and interaction with many actors and networks. The theory of actors pays attention to the relationship between variables. The existing communication and recognition of the role of each actor in an organizational environment, regarding the functions of the information system, can contribute to the extensive evolution of accounting from two perspectives of knowledge and profession. The Actor-network theory is one of the theories of sociology. Auditing every organization always tries to operate efficiently, effectively, and with the lowest cost, using all facilities for economic effectiveness and helping the management provide timely reporting for strategic decisions. The independent evaluation of managers' performance is done through these internal audit groups. The present research is correlational and scientific, and it was carried out using questionnaires, distributed among 250 accountants and auditors of Iranian public and private auditing institutions and the stock exchange market, as well as using the SPSS Software. Based on this, according to the practical aspects of the research and as a distinguishing feature from other conducted research, considering its innovative aspect, the effect of the actors-network and its constituent parts is explained, and its impact is investigated in improving the situation and strategic decisions.

Keywords

[1] D. Ahadianpoor Parvin, Cultural relativism based behavior approach with emphasis on the role of management accountants for management decision making, J. Account. Knowledge Manag. Audit. 3 (2014), no. 9, 33–51.
[2] B. Banitalebi Dehkordi, F. Rahnama Roodposhti, H. Nikomaram, and G. Talebnia, Explaining actor-network theory in accounting from the perspective of knowledge, Sci. Res. Quart. J. Manag. Account. Audit. 4 (2017), no. 16, 119–130.
[3] R. Burga and D. Rezania, Project accountability: An exploratory case study using actor-network theory, Int. J. Project Manag. 35 (2017), no. 6, 1024–1036.
[4] A.A. Daryaei and A. Azizi, The impact of ethics, experience and competency on audit quality (With auditors professional skepticism as a moderating variable), J. Financ. Account. Knowledge 5 (2018), no. 1, 79–99.
[5] Z. Dianati Deilami, A.H. Hossein Pour, and H. Ahmadi, Effect of tools of evolution steps of management accounting on operating profit of companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange exchanged: An empirical examination, Sci. Res. Quart. Financ. Account. Empir. Stud. 12 (2015), no. 29.
[6] G. Esmaeili Kia, F. Sabzalipour, M. Bagherizadeh, and M. Omidi, Investigating the impact of public sector accounting reforms on accountants’ identity by focusing on the actor-network-theory, Empir. Stud. Financ. Account. 18 (2021), no. 72, 139–168.
[7] Z. Fanni, Space, scale and globalization with the analysis of actor-network theory, Strat. Stud. Public Policymak. 4 (2013), no. 12, 93–106.
[8] L.J. Grabowski, Real estate decision making: an actor-network theory analysis of four, small, charitable organizations, Georgia State University, 2012.
[9] Z. Hajiha and M. Kharratzadeh, Study the relationship between the uses of management accounting innovation and financial indicators of performance evaluation of listed companies In Tehran Stock Exchange, Financ. Account. Res. Quart. 8 (2014), no. 19, 79–102.
[10] S. Hamidi, Investigating the relationship between management accounting information system and production performance, a case study: Manufacturing companies in Khuzestan province, First Nat. Conf. Mod. Res. Iran World Manag. Econ. Account. Human., Shiraz, Shushtar University of Applied Sciences, 2017.
[11] G. Harris, The art of quantum planning: Lessons from quantum physics for breakthrough strategy, innovation, and leadership, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2010.
[12] Y. Hassas Yeganeh, Z. Dianati Dilami and E. Noruzbeigi, Management accounting practices in the firms listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange: An empirical examination, J. Manage. Account. 4 (2011), no. 23, 1–18.
[13] Y. Hassas Yeganeh, E. Malekian Kale Basti and E. Tavakolnia, An attitude to auditor’s fear of losing the client; emphasizing on management performance audit, Knowledge Quart. J. Manag. Account. Audit. 7 (2018), no. 29, 209–220.
[14] T. Hyvonen, J. Jarvinen, and J. Pellinen, Struggling for a new role for the business controller, The 8th Conference of the European information and reward systems, J. Account. Res. 38 (2019), 1–34.
[15] A. Jaberi, Applications of the actor-network theory in anthropological researches of organizations: The anthropological study of the formation of the network and the relations of human and non-human actors in an industrial-oil organization in Asalouye Bushehr, Master’s Thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, 2012.
[16] A. Jalili and I. Moshiri, Mental biases in management accounting concepts, Sci. Res. Quart. J. Account. Knowledge Manag. Audit, 2 (2013), no. 6, 41–50.
[17] L. Justesen and J. Mouritsen, Effects of actor-network theory in accounting research, Account. Audit. Account. J. 24 (2011), no. 2, 161–193.
[18] S. Khajavi, M. Hallaj, and K. Ganji, The comparison between domain theory and method theory in management accounting researches: the emphasis on actor-network theory, Manag. Account. Res. Quart. 9 (2016), no. 25, 53–72.
[19] I. Khaksari, M.R. Shurvarzi, A. Mehrazzin, and A. Masihabadi, Developing a local model to detect the unethical behavior of managers in financial reporting, J. Islamic Econ. Bank. 10 (2021), no. 36, 325–351.
[20] A. Khosravani and M. Tajiani, The role of management accounting in the decision making of industry managers, Chamber Commerce Lett. 556 (2012), 18–19.
[21] R. Krishnan, A multi-theoretical approach to management accounting research, Plenary speech at the 7th EIASM conference on New Directions in Management Accounting, Brussels, 2010, pp. 15–17.
[22] K. Lukka and J. Vinnari, Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research, Account. Audit. Account. J. 27 (2014), no. 8, 1308–1338.
[23] R.G. McGrath and I.C. MacMillan, Discovery-Driven Growth: A Breakthrough Process to Reduce Risk and Seize Opportunity, Harvard Business Press, 2009.
[24] H. Moghaddaspour and A. Ebrahimi Koedlar, Compilation and explanation of the management accounting development model in Iran, J. Account. Knowledge Manag. Audit. 3 (2014), no. 10.
[25] M. Namazi and G. Rezaei, The effects of earnings quality criteria on the agency costs:(Evidence from Tehran stock exchange market), Proc.-Soc. Behav. Sci. 230 (2016), 67–75.
[26] T. Pipan and B. Czarniawska, How to construct an actor-network: management accounting from idea to practice, Critical Persp. Account. 21 (2010), no. 3.
[27] J. Pollack, K. Costello, and S. Sankaran, Applying Actor-Network theory as a sensemaking framework for complex organisational change programs, Int. J. Project Manag. 31 (2013), no. 8, 1118–1128.
[28] R.F. Putri and R.F. Putri, The audit of household financial management and information technology on lifestyle in the new normal era, Account. Bus. J. 4 (2022), no. 1, 1–17.
[29] F. Rahnama Rooddposhti and B. Nejad Toolami, Management accounting ontology in the context of postmodernity (performativity, actant-network and applications), Quart. J. Account. Manag. Audit. Knowledge 9 (2016), no. 29, 1–13.
[30] F. Rahnama Rooddposhti and N. Rostami Mazoei, A review of psychological theories in management accounting research, Manag. Account. Sci. Res. Quart. 8 (2017), no. 29.
[31] A.J. Richardson, Paradigms, theory and management accounting practice: a. comment on Parker ’Qualitative management accounting research: assessing deliverables and relevance, Critic. Persp. Account. 23 (2012), no. 1, 83–88.
[32] Rikhardsson and P. Krammergaard, Identifying the impacts of enterprise system implementation and use: Examples from Denmark, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 7 (2006), no. 1, 36–49.
[33] N. Rostami Mazouei, F. Rahnama Rooddposhti, S.M.Raeiszadeh, and Z. Poorzamani, Examining and explaining the effects of technical and human actors on the functions of the management accounting information system using actor-network theory, Manag. Account. Quart. 12 (2019), no. 41, 91–110.
[34] C. Rowe, M. Shields and J. Birnberg, Hardening soft accounting information: Games for planning organizational change, Account. Organ. Soc. 37 (2012), no. 4, 260–279.
[35] A. Sayadi Somar, K. Nasri, and F. Sabzalipoor, Evolution management accounting tools; the solution to reduce the ominous shadow opportunistic restatements, Manag. Account. Res. Quart. 11 (2018), no. 38, 59–78.
[36] M.E. Sobel, Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models, Sociol. Meth. 13 (1982), 290–312.
[37] B. Talebi and J. Bahri Sales, The relationship between management accounting system components, task uncertainty, decentralization and performance of managers manufacturing company Bonab, Manag. Account. Sci. Res. Quart. 11 (2018), no. 36, 15–30.
[38] A. Tatnall, Business culture and the death of a portal, BLED 2007 Proc. Centre Int. Corporate Governance Res., Victoria University, 2007.
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
Volume 16, Issue 5
May 2025
  • Receive Date: 07 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 16 October 2022