The level of representation of some learning styles in the content of Mathematics books for the 4th preparatory class (analysis - evaluation study)

Document Type : Research Paper


Ministry of Education, Directorate of Education Babylon, Iraq


The present research aims at identifying the level of representation of some learning styles in the content of mathematics books for 4th preparatory (scientific and literary). In order to achieve the goal of the research and answer his questions, the researcher has adopted the descriptive research method and the content analysis method for the research sample. By using the content analysis card with indicators of virtual validity. It includes categories of analysis or axes of analysis and represents Learning methods and the their indicators according to the Filder - Silverman model of learning styles, which classified students’ learning styles into several methods: ( Sensing Learners vs Intuitive Learners , visual Learners vs verbal learners , inductive learners versus deductive learners , active learners vs contemplative learners, sequential learners versus holistic learners). The researcher has conducted the content analysis process for mathematics books for 4th preparatory class (scientific and literary) according to specific steps and controls. To determine the level of representation of some learning styles, using frequencies and percentages. As the results of the analysis, it is obvious that the frequency totals for learning styles and their indicators are unequal, and the percentages of their representation level in the content of mathematics books for the 4th preparatory class (scientific and literary) are below the required level and this is realistic evidence that some students’ learning styles have not been taken into consideration. The consideration when preparing mathematics books for the 4th preparatory class (scientific and literary). Therefore, the researcher recommends the need to pay attention to it and take into account the inclusion of all students ’learning methods when preparing mathematics curricula in particular and books in general. 


[1] Abd and H. Muhammad, An evaluation study of the content of the computer book for the fifth grade of middle school in the light of learning patterns, Journal of the College of Basic Education, 25 (2019).
[2] Akram and H. Saeed, Analysis of the content of the Fiqh 2 course for the secondary stage in light of the criteria for learning styles (4Mat), International Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 2 (2017) 269-285.
[3] Al-Azzawi and R. Crowe, Measurement and Evaluation in the Teaching Process, 1st Edition, Tigris House, Amman – Jordan. (2008).
[4] Al-Baiji, J. Hussein and Al-Tamimi, Sana’a, Yaqoub Khudair (2019): Learning styles and their relationship with the cognitive motivation among university students,Journal of the College of Basic Education, 25 (2019).
[5] Al-Bashir, M. Muzammil and S. Malik, An Introduction to Curricula and Teaching Methods, Dar Al-Liwaa, Saudi Arabia (1992).
[6] Al-Batayneh and Ibrahim Muhammad, Principles of Statistics, Administration and Economics, Edition 1, AlMasirah Publishing House, Amman – Jordan. (2011).
[7] Al-Batsh, M. Walid and and F. Abu Zina, Scientific research methods, research design and statistical analysis, 1st Edition, Al Masirah Publishing House, Amman- Jordan, (2007).
[8] Al-Birmani and A. Salman, Preparing a teacher’s guide according to the learning styles of computer books for the middle stage, an unpublished master’s thesis, College of Education for Pure Sciences / Ibn Al-Haytham - University of Baghdad, Iraq. (2016).
[9] Al-Hamdani, Muwaffaq, A. Al-Jadri, A. Kandilji, B. Abdul-Razzaq and F. Abu Zina, Scientific Research Methods, Basics of Scientific Research, 1st Edition, Al-Warraq Publishing Corporation, Amman, Jordan. (2016).
[10] Al-Harbi and Muhammad, The extent to which developed mathematics courses contribute to the development of thinking patterns for the intermediate stage students, An unpublished master’s thesis, Umm Al-Qura University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
[11] Al-Hashemi, Abd al-Rahman and M. Attiya, Curriculum content analysis, 2nd Edition, Safaa Publishing, House, Jordan. (2014).
[12] Al-Hashemi, Abdul-Rahman and M. Attia, Analyzing the Content of School Curricula, 1st Edition, Safaa Publishing House, Jordan, (2011).
[13] Al-Huwaidi and Zaid, Fundamentals of educational measurement and evaluation, 1st Edition, University Book House, Beirut – Lebanon, (2015).
[14] Al-Jabri, K. Karim, D. Abdul-Salam and Z. Hamza, Curriculum and textbook, 1st Edition, Al-Nuaimi Library, Baghdad. (2011).
[15] Al-Jadri, A. Hussein and A. Abdullah, Methodological foundations and statistical uses in educational and human sciences research, first edition, Ithraa for Publishing and Distribution, Amman, Jordan. (2009).
[16] Al-Khatib, Khaled Muhammad, School mathematics, its curricula, its teaching, and mathematical thinking, 1st Edition, Arab Society for Publishing and Distribution Library, Amman, Jordan. (2009).
[17] Al-Khawaldeh, N. Ahmed, and Y. Eid, Curricula: its foundations and intellectual entrances, 1st Edition, Zamzam Publishing House, Jordan. (2014).
[18] Al-Shibli and I. Mahdi, Curricula. build it. implement it. its calendar. Developed (using models), 2nd floor, Dar Al-Amal for Publishing and Distribution, Jordan, (2000).
[19] Al-Titi and M. Issa,(2007): Social education and its teaching methods, Aalem House of Culture, Amman - Jordan (2007).
[20] Attia and M. Ali, Modern curricula and teaching methods, Curriculum House, Amman – Jordan, (2009).
[21] Badawi and R. Massad, Active learning , First Edition, Dar Al Fikr Publishers and Distributors, Amman-Jordan, (2010).[22] B. Berelson, Content analysis in communication research, new york: hafener publishing co, (1971).
[23] Elyan, R. Mustafa and O. Ghunaim, Scientific research methods, theoretical and application, 5th edition, Safaa Publishing House, Jordan, (2013).
[24] N. Entwistle, Styles of learning and teaching, Jon Wiley and Sons, New york, (1981).
[25] R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engr. Education, 7 (2006) 681 - 674.
[26] Gregory, A new look at the lecture method. British Jaurnal of Education Technology, 6 (1975) 55-62.
[27] A. Hamid, Khadra and S. Bassiouni, Curricula and Methods of Teaching Islamic Education, Dammam, Al Mutanabbi Library, (2021).
[28] Hariri, Rafida, Total quality in curricula and teaching methods, 1st Edition, Dar Al Masirah for Publishing, Distribution and Printing, Jordan, (2011).
[29] Muhammad, W. Abdullah and R. Abd Al-Azim, Analyzing curriculum content in the humanities, 1st Edition, Amman– Jordan, (2012).
[30] Nicoll- Senft, JM and Seider, Assessing the impact of the 4mat teaching model across multiple disciplines in higher education, College Teaching 58, (2010) 19-27.
[31] Obeidat, Thouqan and S. Abu Al-Sameed, The brain, learning and thinking, I 1, Dar Al-Fikr Publishers and Distributors, Amman – Jordan, (2013).
[32] Qatami and Yusef, The psychology of classroom learning and teaching , Dar Al Shorouk for Publishing and Distribution, Amman-Jordan, (1998).
[33] Qatami, Yusef and others, Teaching design, T (3), Dar Al Fikr, Amman – Jordan, (2008).
[34] Salama and H. Ali, Methods of teaching mathematics between theory and practice, 1st Edition, Dar Al-Fajr for Publishing and Distribution, Cairo – Egypt, (1995).
[35] Salim, Muhammad Saber and others, Curriculum building and planning, Dar Al-Fikr, Jordan, (2006).
[36] Samara, Aziz, M. Ibrahim, and E. Al-Nimr, Principles of measurement and evaluation in education, 2nd Edition, Dar Al Fikr, Jordan, (1989).
[37] W. Scott and W. Mchorel, Introduction to psychological research, New York, Wiley, (1969).
[38] E. Tartar and R. Dikici, The effect of the 4Mat method (learning styles and brain hemispheres) of instruction on achievement in mathematics, IJ Math Edu. Sci. Tech, 8 (2009) 1027-1036.
[39] The Iraqi Ministry of Education, Secondary school system, Ministry of Education Press, Baghdad, Iraq, 2 (1984).
Volume 12, Issue 2
November 2021
Pages 1023-1050
  • Receive Date: 03 February 2021
  • Revise Date: 10 April 2021
  • Accept Date: 17 April 2021