Multi-level supply chain recovery after disturbance; Mathematical modeling of Iran Khodro chain recovery

Tabatabaei, Seyed Majid; Seyed Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad; RashidiKomijan, Alireza

doi:10.22075/ijnaa.2021.5668

Multi-level supply chain recovery after disturbance; Mathematical modeling of Iran Khodro chain recovery

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Seyed Majid Tabatabaei ¹

Seyed Mohammad Seyed Hosseini ²

Alireza RashidiKomijan ³

¹ Ph.D. Student in Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran, Iran.

² Professor of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

³ Associated Professor of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh Branch, Iran.

10.22075/ijnaa.2021.5668

Abstract

In this research, the main purpose of managing disorders that occurs in the supply chain of Iran Khodro, in such a way that the supply chain can keep the service provided to the customer in the event of a disturbance, or created the lowest changes in the customer’s service. . For this purpose, first examines the concepts and theories associated with disruption and recovery in the supply chain, and then the research mathematical model is designed and presented. Finally, the validation of the model and solving a model based on data collected from Iran Khodro is presented in one of the real issues of the company. Based on the results, it is determined that the occurrence of an impairment in one of the suppliers can disturb the entire supply of supply chain members to disturb, and when the disorder is corrected, the retarded production process to the next periods. Transferred and its recovery in subsequent periods will continue with the production disturbance of subsequent periods to 15 periods, and then its impact will be resolved, which can be expressed by taking 1 year production periods that the impact of sanction and lack of production of production pieces It has been remained in the system for 15 years and can disrupt this system without increasing production capacity and will recover the production system for 15 years.

Keywords

Supply chain

Supply chain disorder

Supply chain recovery

Mathematical modeling

Metric LP technique

Algorithm NSGAII

[1] N. A. Z. Abidin and B. Ingirige, Identification of the “Pathogenic” Effects of Disruptions to Supply Chain Resilience in Construction, Procedia engineering, 212 (2018) 467-474.
[2] C. Bode and S. M. Wagner, Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply
chain disruptions, Journal of Operations Management, 36 (2015) 215-228.
[3] C. Cao, C. Li, Q. Yang, Y. Liu and T. Qu, A novel multi-objective programming model of relief distribution
for sustainable disaster supply chain in large-scale natural disasters, Journal of Cleaner Production, 174 (2018)
1422-1435.
[4] E. Fern´andez, V. Bogado, E. Salomone and O. Chiotti, Framework for modelling and simulating the supply process
monitoring to detect and predict disruptive events, Computers in Industry, 80 (2016) 30-42.
[5] J. He, F. Alavifard, D. Ivanov and H. Jahani, A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply
chain, (2018).
[6] Y. Higuchi, T. Inui, T. Hosoi, I. Takabe and A. Kawakami, The impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake on
the labor market—need to resolve the employment mismatch in the disaster-stricken areas, Japan Labor Review,
9(4) (2012) 4-21.
[7] H. G. Huntington, Measuring oil supply disruptions: A historical perspective, Energy Policy, 115 (2018) 426-433.
[8] M. Kamalahmadi and M. M. Parast, An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies, International
Journal of Production Economics, 184 (2017) 210-230.
[9] M. Kumar, P. Basu and B. Avittathur, Pricing and sourcing strategies for competing retailers in supply chains
under disruption risk, European Journal of Operational Research, 265(2) (2018) 533-543.
[10] C. Li, X. Qi and D. Song, Real-time schedule recovery in liner shipping service with regular uncertainties and
disruption events, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 93 (2016) 762-788.
[11] H. S. Loh and V. Van THAI, Cost consequences of a port-related supply chain disruption, The Asian Journal of
Shipping and Logistics, 31(3) (2015) 319-340.
[12] H. S. Loh, Q. Zhou, V. V. Thai, Y. D. Wong and K. F. Yuen, Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of port-centric
supply chain disruption threats, Ocean & Coastal Management, 148 (2017) 53-62.
[13] K. Park, H. Min and S. Min, Inter-relationship among risk taking propensity, supply chain security practices, and
supply chain disruption occurrence, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2) (2016) 120-130.
[14] A. R. Ravindran, R. Ufuk Bilsel, V. Wadhwa and T. Yang, Risk adjusted multicriteria supplier selection models
with applications, International journal of production research, 48(2) (2010) 405-424.
[15] T. Sawik, Disruption Mitigation and Recovery in Supply Chains using Portfolio Approach, (2018).
[16] T. Schoenherr, V. Rao Tummala and T. P. Harrison, Assessing supply chain risks with the analytic hierarchy
process: providing decision support for the offshoring decision 9 9, (2008).
[17] J. Tokui, K. Kawasaki and T. Miyagawa, The economic impact of supply chain disruptions from the Great EastJapan earthquake, Japan and the World Economy, 41 (2017) 59-70.