Comparison of the effect of using corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of companies based on Ponzi trap (Case study: Tehran Capital Markets companies)

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Humanities, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran

2 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran


The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of using corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of companies based on Ponzi trap. The research method is exploratory. The statistical population of this study is Tehran capital market companies. The research period is from 1394 to 1398. From the statistical population of the research, 132 companies were selected as the sample size by the elimination method. In-house and extra-organizational mechanisms were used to lead the company. In this research, correlation test and regression analysis and Eviews software have been used to test the research hypotheses and determine whether they are significant or not. Findings showed that the results of the question test indicate that there is a significant relationship between corporate governance system with optimal and moderate performance on companies avoiding getting caught in the ponzi trap (money laundering). There is no significant relationship between corporate governance and poor performance of companies to avoid getting caught in the ponzi trap (money laundering). Also, the results of the main question showed that there is a significant relationship between corporate governance systems on companies avoiding getting caught in the Ponzi trap (money laundering).


[1] I. Abbasi and V. Marzloo, Investigating the impact of free floating stocks on liquidity in Tehran Stock Exchange,
Financ. Account. Res. 3(3(9)) (2011) 147–161.
[2] M.R. Abbaszadeh, M. Maftounian, M. Fadaei and M. Babaeikalarijani, The effect of corporate governance and
management overconfidence on corporate tax avoidance in life cycle stages, Empirical Account. Res. 10(4) (2020)
[3] M. Bashkoo, M. Niknam and M.R. Sabeghi, The effect of corporate governance mechanisms and ownership typeson profit management in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Quart. J. New Res. Manag. Account.
4(1) (2017).
[4] U. Bhattacharya, On the possibility of Ponzi schemes in transition economies, Mimeo, 1998.
[5] G. Biddle, G. Hilary and R.S. Verdi, How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?, J.
Account. Econ. 48(2–3) (2009) 112–131.
[6] A. Carvajal, H. Monroe, C. Pattillo and B. Wynter, Ponzi Schemes in The Caribbean International Monetary
Fund, Washington, DC: IMF, 2009.
[7] I.J. Chen and S.H. Lin, Managerial optimism, investment efficiency, and firm valuation, Multinat. Finance J.
17(3–4) (2013) 1–46.
[8] D. Cort´es, J. Santamar´ıa and J.F. Vargas, Economic shocks and crime: evidence from the crash of Ponzi schemes,
J. Econ. Behav. Organiz. 131 (2016) 263–275.
[9] S. Di Gloria and G.M. Mantovani, On the shareholders’ composition of the company and the governance mechanisms of the firm. Can this contribute to the firm performance (including the capacity to attract capital and bank
allowances)?, Ca’ Foscari University in Venice–Department of Management; EM Strasbourg-Business School,
[10] A. Drviver, US charges Stanford with massive Ponzi scheme, Reuters, London, (2009).
[11] M. Eskandari, Corporate governance; From words to deeds, World Economy Newspaper, (2011).
[12] J. Gathergood and J. Weber, Financial literacy: a barrier to home ownership for the young?, J. Urban Econ. 99
(2017) 62–78.
[13] M.H. Ghaemi and M. Shahriari, Corporate governance and financial performance of companies, Account. Adv.
1(1) (2010) 113–128.
[14] M.F.C. Gomariz and J.P.C. Ballesta, Financial reporting quality, debt maturity and investment efficiency, J.
Bank. Finance 40(3) (2014) 494–506.
[15] J.E. Grable, Financial risk tolerance and additional factors that affect risk taking in everyday money matters, J.
Bus. Psych. 14(4) (2000) 625–630.
[16] Z. Hajiha and A. Shakeri, Corporate governance, disclosure of social responsibility, and company value, Financ.
Account. Audit. Res. 11(44) (2019) 175–192.
[17] Y. Hasas Yeganeh, M. Moradi and H. Eskandar, Study of the relationship between institutional investors and
company value, Account. Audit. Rev. 15(52) (2008) 107–122.
[18] R.J. Jacoby, L.E. Fabricant, R.C. Leonard, B.C. Riemann and J.S. Abramowitz, Just to be certain: Confirming the
factor structure of the intolerance of uncertainty scale in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, J. Anxiety
Disord. 27(5) (2013) 535–542.
[19] V. Kahrizsangi Ebrahimi and K. Bakhredi Nasab, The role of corporate leadership in strategic management
accounting, Manag. Account. 12(41) (2019) 69–89.
[20] W. Keep and P. Nat, Multilevel marketing and pyramid schemes in the United States: An historical analysis, J.
Hist. Res. Market. 6(2) (2014) 188–210.
[21] M. Lee, Gender differences in financial risk taking: The role of financial literacy and risk tolerance, Econ. Lett.
145 (2018) 130–135.
[22] W.W. Liang, Marketing fraud: An approach for differentiating multilevel marketing from pyramid schemes, J.
Public Policy & Market. 21(1) (2018) 139–151.
[23] C.G. Lord, L. Ross and M.R. Lepper, Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories
on subsequently considered evidence, J. Person. Soc. Psych. 37(11) (2014) 2098–2109.
[24] D.H. McKnight, L.L. Cummings and N.L. Chervany, Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships,
Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3) (1998) 473–490.
[25] M.R. Mehrabanpour and F.S. Mirichimeh, The effect of corporate governance on capital cost and corporate risk,
Empirical Account. Res. 8(1) (2018) 227–245.
[26] K. Mohammadi and I. Noroush, Assessing the impact of internal corporate governance mechanisms on the level
of cash holding in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, First National Conference on Accounting and
Management, Natanz, Islamic Azad University, 2018.
[27] S.R. Mousavi, H. Jabbari and A. Talibbeidakhti, Corporate governance and restatement of financial statements,
Financ. Account. Audit. Res. 7(25) (2015) 103–126.
[28] I. Noravesh and S. Hosseini, Corporate disclosure quality (consist of timeliness and reliability) and earnings
management, Account. Audit. Rev. 16(2) (2009).
[29] F. Rahnamaei Roodposhti, A Model for Measuring the Effect of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Earnings
Management in Tehran Stock Exchange, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Branch of Science and Research, PhD
dissertation in Business Management, 2009.[30] G. Rajabi, Assessing the reliability and validity of the general self-efficacy beliefs scale (GSE-10) in psychology students of the faculty of educational sciences and psychology of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz and
Marvdasht Azad University, New Education. Thoughts 2(1–2) (2006) 111–122.
[31] S.H. Sajadi, H. Farazmand, M. Dastgir and D. Dehghanfar, Factors affecting conditional audit report, Empirical
Stud. Financ. Account. 5(18) (2007) 123–146.
[32] K. VadiZadeh, The Effect of Ponzi Animal Phenomenon on The Performance of Member Companies of Tehran
Stock Exchange, Master Thesis in Accounting, University of Tehran, 2018.
[33] R.G. Viltin, The optics of fraud: Affiliations that enhance offender credibility, J. Financ. Crime 19(3) (2017)
[34] J. Zhai and Y. Wang, Accounting information quality, governance efficiency and capital investment choice, China
J. Account. Res. 9(4) (2016) 251–266.
[35] A. Zhu, P. Fu, Q. Zhang and Z. Chen, Ponzi scheme diffusion in complex networks, Phys. A: Statist. Mech. Appl.
479 (2017) 128–136.
Volume 13, Issue 1
March 2022
Pages 3281-3292
  • Receive Date: 01 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 30 August 2021
  • First Publish Date: 16 January 2022