International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
New results of modern concept on the fourth-Hankel determinant of a certain subclass of analytic functions
Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education for Girls, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
2 Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Diwaniyah, Iraq
Abstract
A form for the fourth Hankel determinant is given in this paper as
$$H_4 (1)=\begin{vmatrix}
1 & \mathfrak{a}_2 & \mathfrak{a}_3 & \mathfrak{a}_4 \\
\mathfrak{a}_2 & \mathfrak{a}_3 & \mathfrak{a}_4 & \mathfrak{a}_5 \\
\mathfrak{a}_3 & \mathfrak{a}_4 & \mathfrak{a}_5 & \mathfrak{a}_6 \\
\mathfrak{a}_4 & \mathfrak{a}_5 & \mathfrak{a}_6 & \mathfrak{a}_7 \\
\end{vmatrix}$$
The modern concept of the fourth Hankel determinant is studied for the subclass of analytic functions $\mu \left(\beta ,\lambda ,t\right)$ defined here using the concept of subordination. Bounds on the coefficients $\left|a_n\right|$ with n = 2,3,4, 5,6,7 for the functions in this newly introduced class are given and the upper bound of the fourth Hankel determinant for this class is obtained. Lemmas used by the authors of this paper improve the results from a previously published paper. Interesting particular cases are given in the corollaries of the main theorems.
Keywords
[2] K.O. Babalola, On H3(1) Hankel determinant for some classes of univalent functions, Inequal. Theory Appl. 6
(2010) 1–7.
[3] D.G. Cantor, Power series with integral coefficients, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 69(3) (1963) 362–366.
[4] N.E. Cho, V. Kumar, S.S. Kumar and V. Ravichandran, Radius problems for starlike functions associated with
the sine function, Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 45(1) (2019) 213–232.
[5] P. Dienes, The Taylor Series: An Introduction to the Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable, NewYork-Dover:
Mineola, NY, USA, 1957.
[6] P.L. Duren, Univalent Functions, Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 1983.
[7] A. Janteng, S.A. Halim and M. Darus, Coefficient inequality for a function whose derivative has a positive real
part, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 7(2) (2006) 1–5.
[8] D.V. Krishna and T. RamReddy, Second Hankel determinant for the class of Bazilevic functions, Stud. Univ.
Babes-Bolyai Math. 60(3) (2015) 413–420.
[9] W.C. Ma and D. Minda, A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions, Proc. Conf. Complex
Anal. (Tianjin 92), 1 (1994).
[10] R. Mendiratta, S. Nagpal and V. Ravichandran, On a subclass of strongly starlike functions associated with
exponential function, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 38(1) (2015) 365–386.
[11] G. Polya and I.J. Schoenberg, Remarks on de la Vallee Poussin means and convex conformal maps of the circle,
Pacific J. Math. 8(2) (1958) 259–334.
[12] C. Pommerenke, On the coefficients and Hankel determinants of univalent functions, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1(1)
(1966) 111–122.
[13] C. Pommerenke, On the Hankel determinants of univalent functions, Mathematika 14(1) (1967) 108–112.
[14] I.A. Rahman, W.G. Atshan and G.I. Oros, New concept on fourth Hankel determinant of a certain subclass of
analytic functions, Afrika Mat. 33(1) (2022).
[15] S. Sharma and A.J. Obaid, Mathematical modelling, analysis and design of fuzzy logic controller for the control
of ventilation systems using MATLAB fuzzy logic toolbox, J. Interdis. Math. 23(4) (2020) 843–849.
[16] H.M. Srivastava, Q.Z. Ahmad, N. Khan and B. Khan, Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for a subclass of q-starlike
functions associated with a general conic domain, Math. 7(2) (2019) 181.
[17] H.M. Srivastava, S. Altınkaya and S. Yalcın, Hankel determinant for a subclass of bi-univalent functions defined
by using a symmetric q-derivative operator, Filomat 32(2) (2018) 503–516.
)
Volume 12, Special Issue
December 2021Pages 2243-2255
- Receive Date: 15 October 2021
- Revise Date: 13 November 2021
- Accept Date: 08 December 2021