Interval model for calculating prospect cross efficiency of data envelopment analysis and providing a solution for its expansion in fuzzy model

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Cross efficiency evaluation of data envelopment analysis (DEA) is an effective tool in measuring the performance of decision-making units. In general, in cross efficiency evaluation models, it is assumed that decision makers are completely rational, in which case they refrain from considering the risk attitude that plays an important role in the evaluation process. In order to fill this gap, cross efficiency evaluation in DEA was performed based on prospect theory. In the real world, many inputs and outputs are not known, which are called inaccurate data; what is expected is that even if one of the data is not accurate, the answer will probably not be accurate. To solve this problem, the present study presents models that are able to evaluate the prospect cross efficiency with interval data and proves the feasibility of the models by proving the theorems.

Keywords

[1] M. Abdellaoui, H. Bleichrodt and C. Paraschiv, Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement, Manag. Sci. 53(10) (2007) 1659-–1674.[2] M. Allais, Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole
americaine, Econometrica 21(4) (1953) 503-–546.
[3] T.R. Anderson, K.B. Hollingsworth and L.B. Inman, The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model, J.
Produc. Anal. 18(1) (2002) 249-–255.
[4] R.D. Banker, A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data
envelopment analysis, Manag. Sci. 30 (1984) 1078—1092.
[5] O. Berman, N. Sanajian and J.M. Wang, Location choice and risk attitude of a decision maker, Omega 66 (2017)
170—181.
[6] H. Bleichrodt, U. Schmidt and H. Zank, Additive utility in prospect theory, Manag. Sci. 55(5) (2009) 863—873.
[7] E. Borgonovo, V. Cappelli, F. Maccheroni and M. Marinacci, Risk analysis and decision theory: A bridge, Eur.
J. Oper. Res. 264(1) (2018) 280-–293.
[8] A. Boussofiane, R.G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis, Applied data envelopment analysis, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 52(1)
(1991) 1—15.
[9] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, Eur. J. Oper. Res.
2(3) (1978) 429-–444.
[10] D.K. Despotis, Improving the discriminating power of DEA: Focus on globally efficient units, J. Oper. Res. Soc.
53(3) (2002) 314-–323.
[11] J.R. Doyle and R.H. Green, Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses, J. Oper.
Res. Soc. 45(5) (1994) 567—578.
[12] J.R. Doyle and R.H. Green, Cross-evaluation in DEA: Improving discrimination among DMUs, INFOR: Info.
Syst. Operat. Res. 33(3) (1995) 205-–222.
[13] D. Ellsberg, Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms, Quart. J. Econ. 75(4) (1961) 643—669.
[14] T. Ertay and D. Ruan, Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS,
Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164(3) (2005) 800-–810.
[15] M. Falagario, F. Sciancalepore, N. Costantino and R. Pietroforte, Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public
procurement tenders, Eur. J. Operat. Res. 218(2) (2012) 523-–529.
[16] R.H. Green, J.R. Doyle and W.D. Cook, Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation,
European J. Oper. Res. 90 (1996) 461—472.
[17] J. Haddadnia and O.R. Seryasat, Classing images using words package model and fuzzy weighting of the words of
the vocabulary, J. Appl. Sci. Agriculture, 9(10) (2014) 78–82.
[18] D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47(2) (1979)
263—292.
[19] R.A. Krohling and T.T.M. de Souza, Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision
making, Expert Syst. Appl. 39(13) (2012) 11487-–11493.
[20] R. Lahdelma and P. Salminen, Prospect theory and stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA), Omega
37(5) (2009) 961—971.
[21] T. Lejarraga and J. M¨uller-Trede, When experience meets description: How dyads integrate experiential and
descriptive information in risky decisions, Manag. Sci. 63(6) (2017) 1953—1971.
[22] L. Liang, J. Wu, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation, Int. J.
Prod. Econ. 113(2) (2008) 1025-–1030.
[23] S. Lim, Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA, Computers & Industrial Engineering,
62(3) (2012) 726—731.
[24] H.H. Liu, Y.Y. Song, G.L. Yang, Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect
theory, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 273 (2019) 364—375.
[25] J.D. Qin, X.W. Liu and W. Pedrycz, An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green
supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment, European J. Operat. Res. 258(2) (2017) 626-–638.
[26] A. Rahmani, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, M. Rostamy-Malkhalifeh and T. Allahviranloo, A new method for defuzzification and ranking of fuzzy numbers based on the statistical beta distribution, Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 2016 (2016)
6945184.
[27] M. Scholz, V. Dorner, G. Schryen and A. Benlian, A configuration-based recommender system for supporting
e-commerce decisions, European J. Operat. Res. 259(1) (2017) 205—215.
[28] T.R. Sexton, R.H. Silkman and A.J. Hogan, Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions, In: R.H.
Silkman (Eds.), Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis, San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass, 1986.
[29] J.E. Smith and C. Ulu, Risk aversion, information acquisition, and technology adoption, Operat. Res. 65(4) (2017)
1011—1028.[30] B. Vipin and R.K. Amit, Describing decision bias in the newsvendor problem: A prospect theory model, Omega
82 (2017) 132–141.
[31] Y.M. Wang and K.S. Chin, A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension, Expert Syst.
Appl. 37 (2010) 3666—3675.
[32] Y.M. Wang and K.S. Chin, Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation, Int. J. Prod. Econ.
128(1) (2010) 332—338.
[33] L. Wang, Y.M. Wang and L. Mart´─▒nez, A group decision method based on prospect theory for emergency situations,
Info. Sci. 418 (2017) 119-–135.
[34] J. Wu, L. Liang and Y. Chen, DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings, Omega 37(4) (2009)
909—918.
[35] H.G. Zadeh, J. Haddadnia, O.R. Seryasat and S.M.M. Isfahani, Segmenting breast cancerous regions in thermal
images using fuzzy active contours, EXCLI J. 15 (2016) 532.
Volume 12, Special Issue
December 2021
Pages 2475-2491
  • Receive Date: 07 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 03 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 17 December 2021