International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications

Comparative performance analysis of various digital image edge detection techniques with hybrid edge detection technique which is developed by combining second order derivative techniques log and Canny

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Electronics and Comm. Engineering, S. V. Polytechnic College, Bhopal, (M.P.), India

2 Mathematics Division, SASL, VIT University Bhopal, (M.P.), India

3 Department of Electronics and Comm. Engineering, LNCT College, Bhopal (M.P.), India

Abstract

Edge detection is a digital image processing technique to find the boundaries or edges of an image or object through brightness discontinuity. There are many operators to get boundaries or edges but we need more effective and accurate methods.  This paper will provide a comparison of hybrid techniques that combine second-order derivative techniques Log and Canny,  With Conventional Sobel, Prewitt, Roberts, Canny and Log Operators  Edge Detector Techniques With regard to visual inspection, Mean Square Error (MSE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), signal to noise ratio (SNR), peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), mean-absolute error (MAE) and Bit error, etc.

Keywords

[1] D. Poobathy and R. Manicka, Edge detection operators: Peak signal to noise ratio based comperison, I. J. Image,
Graphics and Signal Process. 10 (2014), 55–61.
[2] A. Nath, Image denoising algorithms: A comparative study of different filtration approaches used in image restoration, Commun. Syst. Network Technol. Int. Conf. 2013, p. 157–163.
[3] C. Saxena and D. Kourav, Noises and image denoising techniques: A brief survey, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv.
Engin. 4 (2014), no. 3, 878–885.
[4] V. Rani, A brief study of various noise model and filtering techniques, J. Glob. Res. Comput. Sci. 4 (2013), no.
4, 166–171.[5] M. Aggarwal, R. Kaur and B. Kaur, A review of denoising filters in image restoration, Int. J. Current Res. Acad.
Rev. 2 (2014), no. 3, 83–89.
[6] J. Patil and S. Jadav, A comparative study of image denoising techniques, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Engin. Technol.
2 (2013), no. 3.
[7] R.M. Yousaf, H.A. Habib, H. Dawood and S. Shafiq, A comparative study of various edge detection methods, 14th
Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Secur. IEEE, 2018, p. 96–99.
[8] D. Poobathy and R. Monicka Chezian, Recognizing and mining various objects from digital image, Proc. 2nd Int.
Conf. Comput. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2013, p. 89–93.
[9] S. Vijayarani and M. Vinupriya, Performance analysis of Canny and Sobel edge detection algorithms in image
mining, Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Engin. 1 (2013), no. 8, 1760-1767.
[10] R.C. Gonzalez, R.E. Woods and S.L. Eddins, Digital image processing using Matlab, Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Prentice Hall, 2004.
[11] A.D. Chitra, P. Ponmuthuramalingam, An approach for Canny edge detection algorithm on face recognition, Int.
J. Sci. Res. 4 (2015), no. 11, 24–27.
[12] G.T. Shrivakshan and C. Chandrasekar, A comparison of various edge detection techniques used in image processing, Int. J. Comput. Sci. 9 (2012), no. 5, 1694-0814.
[13] G.M.H. Amer, A.M. Abushaala, Edge Detection Methods, 2nd World Symp. Web Appl. Network. IEEE, 2015, p.
1–7.
[14] D. Kornack, P. Rakic, R. Tsuruta and D.-J. Kang, Cell proliferation without neurogenesis in, Quant. Assess.
Vulner. Critical Inf. Syst. A New Method Eval. Secur. Enhanc. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 28 (2008), 483–491
[15] M. Kumar and R. Saxena, Algorithm and technique on various edge detection: A survey, Signal Image Process.
Int. J. 4 (2013), no. 3.
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
Volume 13, Special Issue for selected papers of ICDACT-2021
The link to the conference website is https://vitbhopal.ac.in/event/icdact_dec_21/
March 2022
Pages 89-95
  • Receive Date: 10 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 21 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 19 January 2022