Examining external shocks and welfare losses with emphasis on monetary rule

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Faculty of Management, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

2 Department of Management, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.

3 Department of Economics, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.


The economies of countries may face a variety of shocks driven by various factors, leading to high economic and non-economic costs. Therefore, it is essential to investigate different external shocks in the economy, as well as how these shocks can be managed. Accordingly, this study aims to investigate the effect of external shocks (global oil price shock, global inflation, and foreign interest) on macroeconomic variables. This study also seeks to examine a type of monetary policy consistent with Iran's economic conditions. Focusing on the New Keynesian School of thought, this study develops a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium (SDGE) model compatible with the situation of Iran. This model is comprised of these sectors: household, oil, non-oil, import, final goods production, and government. After performing linearization procedures, this study analyses the shocks responses and results, with a focus on the three rules of monetary policy (headline inflation, core inflation targeting, and exchange rate) for the purpose of optimal monetary policy. Studies show increasing number of variables being investigated, but in some cases, this trend has quickly reached stability, yielding an appropriate pattern for adopting the optimal policy. However, in some cases, including GDP, we experience a decreasing response of variables regarding the adoption of headline inflation and exchange rate policies. Consequently, it is necessary to evaluate the appropriate policy. Regarding the deadweight loss in relation to the three monetary rules, the findings of this study show that in the face of volatilities studied, household deadweight loss is affected more strongly by headline inflation rule than the other two policies. In contrast the exchange rate rule plays a less important in the amount of deadweight loss.


[1] K.A. Aastveit, Oil price shock in a data-rich environment, Energy Econ. 45 (2014), 268–279.

[2] J. Aizenman, M. Hutchison and I. Noy, Inflation targeting and real exchange rates in emerging markets, World Dev. 39 (2011), 712–724.

[3] J.P. Allegret and M.T. Benkhodja, External shocks and monetary policy in a small open oil exporting economy, Econ. Working Paper 39 (2011), no. 20, 11-39.

[4] M. Antosiewicz, P. Lewandowski and J.B. Witajewski, Input vs. output taxation - A DSGE approach to modelling resource decoupling, Sustainability 8 (2016), no. 4, Articl no 352, 1–17.

[5] R.J. Barro and D.B. Gordon, Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy, J. Monetary Econ. 12 (1983), 121–101.

[6] G. Calvo, Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework, J. Monetary Econ. 12 (1983), 383–398.

[7] J.B. Carlson, Rules versus discretion: making a monetary rule operational, Econ. Rev. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 24 (1988), no. 3, 2.
[8] E. Castelnuovo and S. Nistic´o, Stock market conditions and monetary policy in a DSGE model for the US, J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 34 (2010), 1700-1731.

[9] T.F. Chung and M. Ariff, A test of the linkage among money supply, liquidity and share prices in Asia, Japan World Econ.. 39 (2016), 48–61.

[10] H. Dargahi and R. Sharbatoghli, Monetary policy rule in case of inflation persistency of Iran: An optimal control approach, J. Econ. Res. 45 (2011), no. 4, 1–27.

[11] E. Eltejaei and M.A.A. Arbab Afzali, Asymmetric effects of oil Price shocks on Iran’s Major Economic Variables, J. Iran. Econ. 1 (2014), no. 1, 1–26.

[12] G. Filis, S. Degiannakis and C. Floros,Dynamic correlation between stock market and oil prices: The case of oil-importing and oil-exporting countries,Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 20 (2011), no. 3, 152–164.

[13] M. Khalili Araghi, H. Shakouri and M. Zangeneh, Optimal monetary policy for the Iranian Economy: An ppplication of optimal control theory, J. Econ. Res. 44 (2010), no. 3.

[14] F. Kydland and E. Prescott, Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans, J. Politic. Econ. 85 (1977), 473–490.

[15] S. T. Kim and L. Rescigno, Monetary policy shocks and distressed firms’ stock returns: Evidence from the publicly traded US firms, Econ. Lett. 160 (2017), 91–94.

[16] J. Medina and C. Soto, Oil shocks and monetary policy in an estimated DSGE model for a small open economy, Central Bank of Chile, Working Paper, no. 353, 2005.

[17] J. Miao, P. Wang and Z. Xu, A Bayesian DSGE model of stock market bubbles and business cycles, Working paper, 2013, Available at: www.aeaweb.org.

[18] J. Miao, P. Wang and Z. Xu, A Bayesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of stock market bubbles and business cycles, Quant. Econ. 6 (2015), 559–635.

[19] A. Salah Manesh and A. Pour Javan, Design & calibration of new Keynesian DSGE model with stock market dynamics in Iranian economy, J. Financ. Knowledge Secur. Anal. 38 (2017), 57–75.

[20] L.E. Svensson, Inflation forecast targeting: Implementing and monitoring inflation targets, Eur. Econ. Rev. 41 (1997), 1111–1146.

[21] J.B. Taylor, Housing and monetary policy, no. w13682, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007.

[22] M. Vukotiœc, Exchange rate dynamics in an estimated small open economy DSGE model, Mimeo. Duke University, 2007, available at https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/staff/mvukotic/exchange.pdf.

[23] D. Volkart, Rules, discretion or reputation? Monetary policy and the efficiency of financial markets in Germany, 14th to 16th Centuries, SBS 649, Discussion Papers, N. 007, 2007.

[24] M. Woodford, Optimal interest-rate smoothing, Rev. Econ. Stud. 70 (2003), 886–861.

[25] M. Zahabi, F. Barazan and Z. Afshari, Calculate the optimal monetary policy rule by examining the current account and exchange rate fluctuations (Bayesian approach), Quart. J. Econ. Res. Polic. 83 (2017), 145–181.

[26] P. Zanous, J. Bahrami, H. Tavakolian and T. Mohammadi, The role of international financial integration on production fluctuations and inflation in Iranian economy (DSGE approach), J. Econ. Model. Res. 39 (2018), 7–44.

[27] M.M. Zare Shahneh, Z. Nasrollahi and H. Parsa, The impact of gender inequality on macroeconomic variables in the framework of a DSGE model, Quart. J. Appl. Theor. Econ. 7 (2020), no. 1, 29–60.
Volume 14, Issue 2
February 2023
Pages 111-123
  • Receive Date: 03 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 08 January 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 February 2022
  • First Publish Date: 31 May 2022