Compilation and explanation of the leadership brand model in the agricultural industry, the citrus product of the south of the country

Ameri Siyahooei, Mahmood; Larisemnani, Behrouz; Mahmoudi Maymand, Mohammad; Parhizgar, Mohammad Mahdi

doi:10.22075/ijnaa.2022.28214.3837

Compilation and explanation of the leadership brand model in the agricultural industry, the citrus product of the south of the country

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Mahmood Ameri Siyahooei ¹

Behrouz Larisemnani ¹

Mohammad Mahmoudi Maymand ²

Mohammad Mahdi Parhizgar ¹

¹ Department of Management, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

² Department of Business Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

10.22075/ijnaa.2022.28214.3837

Abstract

The purpose of the current research was to develop an organizational leadership brand model and to investigate and rank the factors affecting the leadership brand in agricultural products (Case Study: Citrus of Hormozgan Province). This research consists of two main parts: in the first part, in order to select the variables affecting the leadership brand in the field of agriculture, the theoretical foundations of research and library studies have been used and after reviewing the articles published in domestic and foreign scientific sites, four elements of personal characteristics of leadership, cultural elements, brand elements and agricultural infrastructure elements were identified as variables affecting the leadership brand in the field of agriculture, Then, using group decision-making technique in three stages, four elements with 80 indicators were identified as factors affecting the leadership brand in the field of agriculture. The final model was constructed for modeling using the technique of the structural equation. The research plan was a combination that was obtained through qualitative strategies (foundation data) and interviews with 35 managers and experts of the Research Department of the Ministry of Agriculture, the Farmer's House and the Chamber of Commerce, and then, through quantitative strategy, the research hypotheses of the research were calculated as a good test for fitting the model. In the qualitative section, after purposeful sampling, data collection tools were used. In the quantitative part, a questionnaire was distributed among 315 managers and experts in order to investigate the viewpoints of managers and experts of the mentioned organizations and to analyze the data, structural equations model with the PLS approach was used. Four general elements of leadership brand variables including personal elements and characteristics, cultural elements, brand elements and agricultural infrastructure elements were identified and categorized as variables affecting the leadership brand in the field of agriculture. The results of quantitative sector findings showed that each of the four elements of leadership brand has a positive effect on leadership brand in the field of agriculture.

Keywords

hip brand

Personality traits

Cultural elements

Brand elements

Agriculture

[1] S.J. Abadi, Z. Mahdavipour, A. Rezaei and F. Nazari, The relationship between employee self-concept, brand identity, brand pride and brand citizenship behaviour and customer satisfaction, Int. J. Bus. Excel. 23 (2021), no. 2, 171–187.
[2] M. Aghaei, Valuation of the Hamrah-e-Aval brand based on brand valuation models using Topsis multi-criteria decision-making model, J. Revenue Pric. Manag. 20 (2021), no. 1, 42–53.
[3] S. Boguslavskay, Structure of production and economic potential of the region, Econ. Financ. Manag. Rev. 2 (2020), no. 2, 16–22.
[4] L. Chen and P.S. Fong, Evaluation of knowledge management performance: An organic approach, Inf. Manag. 52
(2015), no. 4, 431–453.
[5] C.H. Cheng and Y. Lin, Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 142 (2002), no. 1, 174–186.
[6] J. Cheng, J. Nakagawa, M. Yamamoto and T. Yamazaki, Uniqueness in an inverse problem for a one-dimensional fractional diffusion equation, Inv. Prob. 25 (2009), no. 11, 115002.
[7] J. Cohen, The effect size, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (1988), 77–83.

[8] G. Dai, K.Y. Tang and K.P. De Meuse, Leadership competencies across organizational levels: A test of the pipeline model, J. Manag. Dev. 30 (2011), no. 4, 366–380.
[9] R. Fazli-Salehi, I.M. Torres, R. Madadi and M.A. Z´u˜niga, Multicultural advertising: The impact of consumers’ self-concept clarity and materialism on self-brand connection and communal-brand connection, J. Bus. Res. 137 (2021), 46-57.
[10] I.R.A. Gusti, Innovation and transportation of production cost control in improving the quality of agriculture resources as an acceleration solution to support business sector agriculture during the covid 19 period in Indonesia, Int. J. Soc. Sci. (IJSS) 1 (2021), no. 4, 361–372.
[11] J. Henseler and G. Fassott, Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures, Handbook of partial least squares, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 713–735.
[12] H. Hussinki, A. Kianto, M. Vanhala and P. Ritala, Assessing the universality of knowledge management practices, J. Knowl. Manag. 21 (2017), 1596–1621.
[13] T.H. Kim, J.N. Lee, J.U. Chun and I. Benbasat, Understanding the effect of knowledge management strategies on knowledge management performance: A contingency perspective, Inf. Manag. 51 (2014), no. 4, 398–416.
[14] M. Tenenhaus, V. Esposito Vinzi, Y.-M. Chatelin and C. Lauro, PLS path modelling, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 48 (2005), no. 1, 159–205.
[15] G.-H. Tzeng and J.-Y. Teng, Transportation investment project selection with fuzzy multiobjectives, Transport. Plann. Technol. 17 (1993), no. 2, 91–112.
[16] M. Wetzels, G. Odekerken-Schr¨oder and C. Van Oppen, Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quart. 33 (2009), no. 9, 177–195.
[17] C.-H. Wu and W.-C. Fang, Combining the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers, Qual. Quant.: Int. J. Method. 45 (2011), no. 4, 751–768.