Evaluating the effective factors of sustainable management on company performance

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tehran Branch, Malik Ashtar University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the factors affecting sustainable management on the performance of 17 industry experts. The data were collected by a questionnaire, and the variables were tested using the DEMATEL and ISM methods. The results showed that business strategies (C01), size of the board of directors (C02), personal motivation and safety (C03), timely delivery (C04), and organizational culture (C09) have strong influence and low influence, which are placed in the area of independent variables. The variables of customer service quality (C05), customer satisfaction (C06), greater brand reputation (C08), and technological capabilities (C11) also had high dependence and little influence, which were dependent variables. The competitiveness variable (C07) has a similar influence and degree of dependence and is a linked variable. Construction quality (C12), external and institutional ownership (C13), skills and attitudes of employees (C14), and operating costs (C15) are also placed in the first quadrant, i.e., the autonomous region.

Keywords

[1] J. Abbas, Impact of total quality management on corporate sustainability through the mediating effect of knowledge management, J. Cleaner Product. 244 (2020), 118806.
[2] F. Afzal and B. Lim, Organizational factors influencing the sustainability performance of construction organizations, Sustainability 14 (2022), no. 16, 10449.
[3] M. Aksoy, M.K. Yilmaz, E. Tatoglu and M. Basar, Antecedents of corporate sustainability performance in Turkey: The effects of ownership structure and board attributes on non-financial companies, J. Cleaner Product. 276 (2020), 124284.
[4] U. Awan, Mediation analysis of environmental training: perceived stakeholder pressure and environmental supply chain management practices, Int. J. Res. Stud. Manag. 6 (2017), no. 1, 1–21.
[5] M. Azam, Does environmental degradation shackle economic growth? A panel data investigation on 11 Asian countries, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 65 (2016), 175–182.
[6] C. Baah, Z. Jin and L. Tang, Organizational and regulatory stakeholder pressures friends or foes to green logistics practices and financial performance: Investigating corporate reputation as a missing link, J. Cleaner Product. 247 (2020), 119125.
[7] C. Baah, D. Opoku-Agyeman, I.S.K. Acquah, Y. Agyabeng-Mensah, E. Afum, D. Faibil, F.A.M. Abdoulaye, Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs, Sustain. Prod. Consump. 27 (2020), 100–114.
[8] T. Baker and T.G. Pollock, Making the marriage work: The benefits of strategy’s takeover of entrepreneurship for strategic organization, Strategic Organ. 5 (2007), no. 3, 297–312.
[9] K. Bewley and Y. Li, Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective, Adv. Environ. Account. Manag. 1 (2000), 201–226.
[10] H.L. Bhaskar, BPR as a Quality Improvement Tool, Handbook of Management, Technology and Social Sciences, 2014.
[11] W. Cai and G. Li, The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance: evidence from China, J. Cleaner Product. 176 (2018), 110–118.
[12] C.A. Cancino, A.I. La Paz, A. Ramaprasad and T. Syn, Technological innovation for sustainable growth: An ontological perspective, J. Cleaner Product. 179 (2018), 31–41.
[13] P. Centobelli, R. Cerchione and R. Singh, The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs, Int. J. Product. Econ. 212 (2019), 111–124.
[14] M. Coulmont, S. Berthelot and V. Gagne, Sustainability performance indicator trends: A Canadian industry-based analysis, Int. J. Corporate Soc. Responsibility 7 (2022), no. 2.
[15] N. Darnall, I. Henriques and P. Sadorsky, Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size, J. Manag. Stud. 47 (2010), no. 6, 1072–1094.
[16] Z. Duric and J. Potocnik Topler, The role of performance and environmental sustainability indicators in hotel competitiveness, Sustainability 13 (2021), no. 12, 6574.
[17] R. Dye, Disclosure of nonproprietary information, J. Account. Res. 23 (1985), 123–145.
[18] C.E. Eesley and M.J. Lenox, Secondary stakeholder actions and the selection of firm targets, Acad. Manag. 2006 (2006), no. 1, B1–B6.
[19] F. Fechete and A. Nedelcu, Performance management assessment model for sustainable development, Sustainability 11 (2019), no. 10, 2779.
[20] D.M. Gligor, M.C. Holcomb and J. Feizabadi, An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: the role of a firm’s orientations, Int. J. Product. Econ. 179 (2016), 24–34.
[21] K. Govindan, M. Kaliyan, D. Kannan and A.N. Haq, Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Product. Econ. 147 (2014), 555–568.
[22] S. Grossman, The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality, J. Law Econ. 24 (1981), 461–484.
[23] D.Z.X. Huang, Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: A review and consolidation, Account. Finance 61 (2021), no. 1, 335–360.
[24] M. Kim, J. Song and J. Triche, Toward an integrated framework for innovation in service: A resource-based view and dynamic capabilities approach, Inf. Syst. Front. 17 (2015), no. 3, 533–546.
[25] L. Kong, H. Li, H. Luo, L. Ding and X. Zhang, Sustainable performance of just-in-time (JIT) management in time-dependent batch delivery scheduling of precast construction, J. Cleaner Product. 193 (2018), 684–701.
[26] D. Li, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, X. Chen and C. Cao, Impact of quality management on green innovation, J. Cleaner Product. 170 (2018), 462–470.
[27] Y. Liu, C.Y. Kim, E.H. Lee and J.W. Yoo, Relationship between sustainable management activities and financial performance: Mediating effects of non-financial performance and moderating effects of institutional environment, Sustainability 14 (2022), no. 3, 1168.
[28] J. Llach, J. Perramon, M.d.M. Alonso-Almeida and L. Bagur-Femen´─▒as, Joint impact of quality and environmental practices on firm performance in small service businesses: an empirical study of restaurants, J. Cleaner Product. 44 (2013), 96–104.
[29] M.T. Lucas, Understanding environmental management practices: Integrating views from strategic management and ecological economics, Bus. Strat. Environ. 19 (2019), 543–556.
[30] A. Mikes, D. Oyon, J. Jeitziner and G. Kpmg, Risk Management: Towards a Behavioral Perspective, Routledge, 2017.
[31] P. Milgrom, Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications, Bell. J. Econ. 12 (1981), 380–391.
[32] V.K. Mittal and K.S. Sangwan, Assessment of hierarchy and inter-relationships barriers to environmentally conscious manufacturing adoption, World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 10 (2013), no. 4, 297–307.
[33] M.A. Salem, N. Hasnan, N.H. Osman, M. Farid, F.S. Shamsudin and H.B.I. Hussain, Corporate environmental performance and competitiveness, Int. J. Appl. Environ. Sci. 10 (2015), no. 4, 1087–1100.
[34] S. Sangle and P. Ram Babu, Evaluating sustainability practices in terms of stakeholders’ satisfaction, Int. J. Bus. Govern. Ethics 3 (2007), no. 1, 56–76.
[35] J. Sarkis, P. Gonzalez-Torre and B. Adenso-Diaz, Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training, J. Oper. Manag. 28 (2010), no. 2, 163–176.
[36] M. Sehrawat, A.K. Giri and G. Mohapatra, The impact of financial development, economic growth and energy consumption on environmental degradation: Evidence from India, Manag. Environ. Quality: Int. J. 26 (2015), no. 5, 666–682.
[37] P. Velte, Does CEO power moderate the link between ESG performance and financial performance? A focus on the German two-tier system, Manag. Res. Rev. 43 (2019), no. 5.
[38] R. Verrecchia, Discretionary disclosure, J. Account. Econ. 5 (1983), 365–380.
[39] K. White, R. Habib and D.J. Hardisty, How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework, J. Market. 83 (2019), no. 3, 22–49.
[40] B. Yuan and Q. Xiang, Environmental regulation, industrial innovation and green development of Chinese manufacturing: based on an extended CDM model, J. Cleaner Product. 176 (2018), 895–908.
[41] M.M. Yusr, S.S.M. Mokhtar, A.R. Othman and Y. Sulaiman, Does interaction between TQM practices and knowledge management processes enhance the innovation performance?, Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 34 (2017), no. 7, 955–974.
Volume 14, Issue 11
November 2023
Pages 309-322
  • Receive Date: 06 October 2022
  • Revise Date: 07 January 2023
  • Accept Date: 10 January 2023