Comparison of two implementation strategies of the flipped learning method in academic mathematics

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Statistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Implementing the flipped learning method in Iran’s higher education with the perspective of localization brings challenges, it seems to depend on classroom participation. In this regard, the purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of gender and personality in group work and to compare the mathematical performance of two different strategies of this new approach. The statistical population of this descriptive-analytical research included four classes of general mathematics II, and all of them took the DISC personality test. In two classes, the students were grouped by their results, and the others were grouped according to personal choice. So, students’ introversion and extroversion, as well as neutral, introverted, extroverted, more introverted, or more extroverted groups, were also determined and recorded. The conducted investigations showed that the flipped learning method with the voluntary grouping strategy was more effective than the other for just females, introverts, and extroverts; the population of males showed similar performance in both strategies; the neutral and more introvert groups in the voluntary grouping, and the introvert and more introvert groups based on the DISC Test had the same result. Eventually, the superiority of students’ mathematical performance was proved in the voluntary grouping compared to grouping by DISC test.

Keywords

[1] H. Alibeigloo, H. Ahmadi, and F. AzizMalayeri, The effect of flipped classroom on Iranian EFL learners’ speech act production: Does flip type make a difference?, Iran. Evol. Educ. Psycho. 3 (2021), no. 2, 118-–137.
[2] M. Alipour and M. Alipour, Analysis of the consequences of flipped learning from the perspective of pre-service teachers of Farhangian University, Sci. Quart. J. Res. Soc. Stud. Educ. 4 (2022), no. 2, 92–110. [In Persian]
[3] I. Al-Rawi, Teaching methodology and its effects on quality learning, J. Educ. Practice 4 (2013), no. 6, 100-–105.
[4] A. Ghartali, M. Rezaei Zadeh, and G. Alamolhoda, Identifying barriers to using flipped class in Iranian higher education, Res. Teach. 8 (2020), no. 4, 212–230. [In Persian]
[5] F-D. Fernandez-Martın, J-M. Romero-Rodrıguez, G. Gomez-Garcıa, and M.R. Navas-Parejo, Impact of the flipped classroom method in the mathematical area: A systematic review, Mathematics 8 (2020), no. 12, 2162.
[6] W. Glasser, Choice Theory: A New Psychology of Personal Freedom, HarperCollins e-books, 1999.
[7] Ch. Gopalan, Sh. Daughrity, and E. Hackmann, The past, the present, and the future of flipped teaching, Adv. Physio. Educ. 46 (2022), no. 2, 331–334.
[8] R.I. Hastuti, Semarang, Indonesia, Flipped classroom learning model with group investigation strategy to increase the enjoyment of mathematics in elementary school students, 5th Seminar Nas. Mat. Dan Pendidi. Mat. (SENATIK), 2020.
[9] K. Jakobsen and M. Knetemann, Putting structure to flipped classrooms using team based learning, Int. J. Teach. Learn. Higher Educ. 29 (2017), no. 1, 177–185.
[10] A.E. Johnson, Shaping student views on mathematics: Influences on year 5 and 6 students’ mathematical dispositions and mindsets towards learning, Master’s Thesis, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand, 2020.
[11] S. Karimi, Investigating the effective components in the dynamic education system, 2nd Int. Conf. Jurisprudence, Law Psycho. Educ. Sci. Iran and Islamic World, Tehran, Iran, 2021. [In Persian]
[12] C.K. Lo, K.F. Hew, and G. Chen, Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education, Educ. Res. Rev. 22 (2017), 50–73.
[13] N. Mousapour, University Teaching: which method? Which pattern?, Teach. Learn. Res. 10 (2014), no. 2, 49–78. [In Persian]
[14] H. Oh, How different grouping methods can improve students mathematical achievement in an appropriate setting, Master’s thesis, Hamline University, 2020.
[15] S.R. Pardimin, S. Rochmiyati, Z. Wijayanto, and M. Susanto, Application of the flipped classroom method and effectiveness in learning mathematics, J. Positive School Psycho. 6 (2022), no. 4, 2441–2452.
[16] I. Rizos, G. Kolokotronis, and A.M. Papanikolaou, Investigating the effectiveness of flipped classroom model in a mathematics education course in Greece, J. Math. Sci. Teacher 3 (2023), no. 1.
[17] D.A. Salazar, Methods of grouping in a flipped classroom model: Effects on students achievement in differential calculus, Int. J. Adv. Res. Dev. 1 (2016), no. 5, 44–50.
[18] B.K. Sarker, Enhanced student class attendance by using concept of flipped classroom approach, J. Soc. Human. Edu. 3 (2023), no. 2, 105–117.
[19] D.P. Schultz and S.E. Schultz, Theories of Personality, Cengage Learning, 2020.
[20] N. Shiranibidabadi, A. Nasrisfahani, A. Rouhollahi, and R. Khalili, Effective teaching methods in higher education: Requirements and barriers, J. Adv. Med. Educ. Profession. 4 (2016), no. 4, 170–178.
[21] P. Sopamena, K. Sangadji, D. Riaddin, S. Kaliky, and G. Assagaf, Effectiveness of flipped classroom model on mathematics achievement at the university level: A meta analysis study, Int. J. Instruc. 16 (2023), no. 1, 767–780.
[22] N. Thi Mai Huong, Innovating teaching methods at the university level: Necessity and problems issues for higher education, Glob. Acad. J. Human. Soc. Sci. 4 (2022), no. 6, 207–212.
[23] E. Toofaninejad, M. Hooshmandja, and A. Allah Kalami, Investigating the use of the flipped classroom approach in higher education: A systematic review, Quart. Educ. Psycho. Allameh Tabatabai Univ. 15 (2019), no. 53, 183–224. [In Persian]

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 03 March 2025
  • Receive Date: 06 July 2024
  • Accept Date: 18 September 2024