The emergence of logic in mathematics and its influence on learners' cognition and way of thinking

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Basic Science and Humanities, Faculty of Arts and Science, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan

2 Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan

Abstract

This article sheds light on the single phrase, logical thinking, which came to be understood in so many diverse ways. To assist explain the many distinct meanings, how they arose, and how they are connected, we trace the emergence and evolution of logical thinking in mathematics. This article is also, to some extent, a description of a movement that arose outside of philosophy's mainstream, and whose beginnings lay in a desire to make logic practical and an essential part of learners' lives.

Keywords

[1] I.H. Anellis, T. Drucker, The first Russell paradox, Perspectives on the History of Mathematical Logic. Cambridge, Mass. Birk¨auser Boston, 1991.
[2] D. Arum, T. Kusmayadi, and I. Pramudya, Students’ logical-mathematical intelligence profile. IOP Conf. Ser. J. Phys. 1008 (2018).
[3] N. Bahtiti, W. Alahmad and T. Sasa, View of manage awareness attitude anxiety experience and E-learning during COVID-19 pandemic evidence from ASU University, Indian J. Forensic Medic. Toxic. 15(3) (2021).
[4] S. Bakhyt, B. Kalimbetov and Z. Khabibullayev, Possibilities of mathematical problems in logical thinking, Development of Secondary Education Pupils. Opci´on 34(35) (2018).
[5] S. Banach and A. Tarski, Sur la d´ecomposition des ensembles de points en parties respectivement congruentes, Fund. Math. 6 (1924).
[6] C. Burali-Forti ”Una questione sui numeri transfiniti” (PDF), Rendiconti Circolo Mate. Palermo 11 (1897) 154– 164.
[7] A. Church, The Richard Paradox, Amer. Math. Month. 41(6) (2018).
[8] K. Clark, Negation as Failure, In H.Gallaire J. Minker (eds.), Logic and Data Bases, Plenum Press, 293-322 (1978).
[9] I.M. Copi, An Introduction to Logic, Informal Logic, New York: MacMillan, 1954.
[10] C. Cresswell and P. Craig, Does mathematics training lead to better logical thinking and reasoning? A crosssectional assessment from students to professors, Plos One 15(7).
[11] N. Emmiyatti, M. Rasyid, M. Rahman, A. Arsyad, , and G. Dirawan, Multiple intelligences profiles of junior secondary school students in Indonesia, Int. Educ. Stud. 7 (2014).
[12] G. Frege, Boole’s Logical Calculus and the Concept-Script, English translation in Gottlob Frege: Posthumous Writings, Blackwell, 1881.
[13] P.J. Garnett and K. Tobin, Reasoning patterns of preservice elementary and middle school science teachers, Sci. Educ. 68(5) (1984) 621–631.
[14] D. Gillies, Logicism and the Development of Computer Science, Antonis C. Kakas and Fariba Sadri (eds,) Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond, Part II, Springer, 2002.
[15] D.A. Gillies, Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Method, Oxford University Press, 1996.
[16] I.J. Good. A Note on Richard’s Paradox, Mind. 75(299) (1966) 431.
[17] K. Houston, How to Think Like a Mathematician, A Companion to Undergraduate Mathematics”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2009).
[18] R. Johnson, Making sense of informal logic, Informal Logic 26(3) (2016).
[19] M. Liebeck, A Concise Introduction to Pure Mathematics. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2011.
[20] M. Pinheiro, Russell’s Paradox, our solution, and the other solutions. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Math. 2(2), 2016, https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtam.2016020 2.22
[21] M. Ristiana, Logical thinking skills of prospective elementary school Teachers, Int. Seminar Appl. Math. Math. Educ. 1315(1) (2019).[22] T. Sasa, T. Alayid, N. Alawneh and O. Miri, The Effect of Using Cooperative Learning on Elementary      Students´ achievement in the unit of Fractions in Mathematics, Int. Medical J. 25(12) (2020).
[23] A. Stolyar, On Some Applications of Logic in Pedagogy to Mathematics, Logic Prob. Training M Pedagogy, 1977.
[24] F. Taweel, E. Abuhijleh and S. Ali, A graceful labeling of square of path graph with quadratic complexity algorithm, WSEAS Trans. Math. 20(39) (2021).
[25] N.C. Valanides, Formal reasoning and science teaching, School Sci. Math. 96(2) (1996) 99–111.
[26] R. Valeeva and K. Shakirova, Development of the Future Mathematics Teachers’ Constructive Skills, Int. Elect. J. Math. Educ. 10(3) (2005).
[27] L. Waterhouse, Inadequate evidence for multiple intelligences, Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence theories, Educ. Psychol. 41(4) (2006).
Volume 13, Issue 1
March 2022
Pages 1151-1160
  • Receive Date: 18 February 2021
  • Revise Date: 15 April 2021
  • Accept Date: 27 April 2021